The Assessment of Grassland Ecosystem Services Value with GIS Technology in HulunBuir City of China


Article Preview

The grassland ecosystem of HulunBuir city is an important component of ecology security system in Northeast China. In this study, net primary productivity (NPP), as an improtant ecological parameter, was used to estmate the services value. Considering the characteristic of satellite imagery, it is difficult to calculate some functions. So we calculated the services value from 6 aspects, including soil erosion control, water conservation, direct production, gas regulation, nutrient recycling and atmospheric environment purification. The total services value of grassland ecosystem was estimated in RMB to be aproximately 18.47×109Yuan in 2006, the average economic value of unit area was 15.4×104Yuan/km2. The direct production value was 1.23×109Yuan/year; and the contribution rate to total value was 6.66%. The water regulation value was the maximum, 9.09×109Yuan/year. Gas regulation value was 5.25×109Yuan/yea. The purify atmosphere value was minimal.



Edited by:

Qi Luo




R. J. Wang et al., "The Assessment of Grassland Ecosystem Services Value with GIS Technology in HulunBuir City of China", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. 55-57, pp. 1742-1747, 2011

Online since:

May 2011




[1] J.M. Adams and H. Faure: Increases in terrestrial carbon storage from the last glacial maximum to the present. Nature , vol. 348(1990), p.71.


[2] A. Richmond and K . Robert: 2007. Valuing ecosystem services: A shadow price for net primary production. Ecological econimics . vol. 64(2007), p.454.


[3] N.J. Beaumonta and M.C. Austena: Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin . vol. 54(2008), p.253.


[4] R. Costanza and R. Groot: The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature vol. 387 (1997), p.253.

[5] R.S. De and M.A. Wilson: A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics . vol. 41(2002), p.393.


[6] S. Engel ,S. Pagiola, and S. Wunder: 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economic vol. (2008), p.663.


[7] S. Farber, R. Costanza: Linking ecology and economics for ecosystem management. Bioscience. vol. 56(2006), p.121.

[8] C.B. Field , CM. Malmstron: Global net primary production: Combining ecology and remote sensing. Remote sensing of Environment. vol. 51(1995), p.74.


[9] I.M. Gren, K.H. Groth and M. Sylen: Economic values of Danube Floodplains. Journal of environmental management. vol. 45(1995), p.333.

[10] E.R. Hunt: Relationship between woody biomass and PAR conversion efficiency for estimating net primary production from NDVI. Int. J. Remote Sensing, vol. 55(1994), p.1725.


[11] M.C. Liu, D.Q. Li and Y.M. Wen : Function and value of water-holding in Sanjingyuan region. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, vol. 14(2006), p.407.

[12] Y.G. Liu, P.H. Peng, W.D. Chen: Study on the function of vegetation in water conservation based on GIS technology in the upper Yangtze river. Journal of Anhui Agri. Sci. vol. 34(2006), p.3323.

[13] Y.Z. Pan, P.J. Shi and Zhu W. Q: Measurement of ecological capital of Chinese terrestrial ecosystem based on remote sensing. Science in China Ser. D Earth Sciences, vol. 34(2004), p.375.

[14] W.J. Parton and D.S. Ojma: Environmental change in rangelands: assessment using models. Climatic Change. vol. 28(2004), p.111.

[15] S.W. Running and J.C. Coughlan: A general model of ecosystem processes for regional applications. Hydrologic balance, canoy gas exchange and primary production processes. Ecological Modelling, vol. 42(1998), p.125.


[16] Y. Xiao and G.D. Xie: The function and economic value of soil conservation of ecosystems in Qinghai-Tibet plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica. Vol. 23(2003), p.2367.