Numerical Investigations of Membrane Surface Effects on NACA 643- 218 Airfoil

Abstract:

Article Preview

This paper presents two dimensional fluid structure interaction (FSI) CFD analysis on the effect of skin thickness and Reynolds number on the aerodynamic performance of NACA 643-218 airfoil. Numerical investigations were performed using FLUENT 6.3 fluid flow solver and ABAQUS 6.8-1 structural solver. Coupling of both solvers in real time mode was accomplished with the Mesh based parallel Code Coupling Interface (MpCCI 3.1). The predicted and experimental results were found to be in excellent match. Generally, the results showed that the aerodynamic lift increases while drag decreases with the decrease of membrane thickness.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Zamir A. Zulkefli, Mohd Sapuan Salit, Suraya Mohd Tahir, Yousuf El-Shekeil, Mohamad Ridzwan Ishak, Abdul Aziz Hairuddin, Azizan As'arry, Khairil Fadzli Abu Bakar and Radhiyah Khalid

Pages:

60-65

Citation:

M.S. Abdul Aziz et al., "Numerical Investigations of Membrane Surface Effects on NACA 643- 218 Airfoil", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 564, pp. 60-65, 2014

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

$38.00

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gordnier, R.E., (2009), High fidelity computational simulation of a membrane wing airfoil, Journal of Fluids and Structures, 25: 897–917.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2009.03.004

[2] Gordnier, R. E. and Attar, P. J. (2009). Implicit LES Simulations of a Low Reynolds Number Flexible Membrane Wing Airfoil. 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition. Orlando, Florida.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-579

[3] Kumar, H. H., Abate, A. G., Albertani, G., (2010), An experimental investigation on the aerodynamic performances of flexible membrane wings in flapping flight, Aerospace Science and Technology, 14 (8): 575-586.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2010.05.003

[4] Shyy, W., Ifju, P., Viieru, D., (2005), Membrane wing-based micro air vehicles Applied Mechanics Reviews, 58, p.283–301.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1946067

[5] Rojratsirikul, P., Wang, Z., Gursul, I., (2008), Unsteady aerodynamics of membrane airfoils. AIAA-2008-0613.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-613

[6] H. Yusoff , M. Z. Abdullah, M. Abdul Mujeebu and K. A. Ahmad, Development of Flexible Wings and Flapping Mechanism with Integrated Electronic Control System, for MAV Research, Experimental Techniques Volume 37, Issue 4, July 2013, Pages 25-37.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2011.00729.x

[7] Shyy, W and Kamakoti, R., (2004), Fluid-structure interaction for aeroelastic applications, Progress in aerospace sciences, 40(8): 535-558.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2005.01.001

[8] K. A. Ahmad, Abdullah, M. Z. and Watterson, J. K. (2010), Numerical Modelling of a Pitching Airfoil, Jurnal Mekanikal, 2010, 30, pages 37-47.

[9] K. A. Ahmad, Numerical study on effect of reduced frequency on a vortex induced by an oscillating sub boundary layer vortex generator, International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Volume 6, Issue 3, December 2011, Pages 317-325.

[10] Abbott, I.H. Von Doenhoff A.E., Stivers Jr. L.S., (1945), Summary of Airfoil data, National Advisory Committee For Aeronautics, Report No. 824, Washington 25, D. C, p.193.

[11] Attar, P. J., Gordnier, G. E., (2009), High-fidelity computational aeroelastic analysis of a plunging membrane airfoil, AIAA 2009-2472, California, p. pp.1-30.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-2472