Cathodic Prevention and Cathodic Protection of Concrete Slab with Zinc Sacrificial Anode


Article Preview

This study is to acquire the confirmation data regarding the cathodic protection and cathodic prevention characteristics for concrete slab specimens in marine environments. It was possible to confirm the performance of cathodic protection system by the measurement of potentials and current density for the concrete slab specimens applied with zinc mesh sacrificial anode in mortar topside of the concrete specimens. The current density for the cathodic protection (CProt) that CP started after a repair of corrosion was higher than that for the cathodic prevention (CPrev) that CP commenced from the beginning of experiment, and 4 hour depolarization potentials were higher in the CPrev system than in the CProt one, and it was confirmed that the CPrev has more protection effect with less protection current, comparing to the CProt. It was also confirmed that the CP of both CPrev and CProt by means of zinc mesh sacrificial anode for reinforced concrete structures were very effective corrosion protection technology in marine environments.



Edited by:

Keishi Matsuda, P.S. Pa and Wiseroad Yun




J. A. Jeong, "Cathodic Prevention and Cathodic Protection of Concrete Slab with Zinc Sacrificial Anode", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 597, pp. 341-344, 2014

Online since:

July 2014





* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.P. Broomfield, Corrosion of Steel in Concrete, 2nd ed. edited by T&F, 2007, p.10–64.

[2] K. Ishii, H. Seki, T. Fukute, K. Ikawa, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 12, (1997).

[3] Bennet, J.E. and Broomfield, J. P, Metal Performance, vol. 36, (1997).

[4] D. G. Enos, A. J. Williams, Jr., G. G. Clemena, and J. R. Scully, Corrosion, vol. 54, (1998).

[5] P. Pedeferri, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 10, 1996, pp.391-402.

[6] J.A. Jeong, C.K. Jin, The effect of temperature and relative humidity on concrete slab specimens with impressed current cathodic protection system, vol. 37, Korean Society of Marine Engineers, 2013, pp.260-265.


[7] Y.B. Ko, G. B, Kim, K.C. Park, Soundness evaluation of friction stir welded A2024 alloy by non-destructive test, vol. 37, Korean Society of Marine Engineers, 2013, pp.135-143.


[8] J.H. Jeong, Y.H. Kim, K.M. Moon, M.H. Lee, J. K Kim, Evaluation of the corrosion property on the welded zone of seawater pipe by A. C shielded metal arc welding, vol. 37, Korean Society of Marine Engineers, 2013, pp.877-885.


[9] S.J. Kim, S.J. Lee, S.O. Chong, Effect of cavitation for electrochemical characteristics in seawater for austenitic 304 stainless steel, vol. 37, Korean Society of Marine Engineers, 2013, pp.484-492.


[10] M. Saleem, M. Shameem, S.E. Hussain, M. M. Maslehuddin, Construction and Building Materials, vol. 10 , 1996, pp.209-210.

[11] F. J. Presuel-Moreno, S. C. Kranc, and A. A. Sagues, Corrosion, vol. 61. (2005).

[12] ASTM C876-91, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 03. 02, (1994).

[13] CMS100 Framework Software Operator's Manual, Gamry Instruments, Inc, (1994).

[14] L. Bertolini, E. Redaelli, Corrosion Science, Vol. 51, 2009, pp.2218-2230.

[15] A.M. Hassanein, G.K. Glass, N.R. Buenfeld, Concrete Composites, vol. 24, 2002, 159-167.

[16] T, Pastore, P. Pedeferri, L. Bertolini, F. Bolzoni, Rehabilitation of Concrete Structures, vol. 4, 1992, p.189~200.

[17] NACE Standard SP 0290, (2007).