Characteristics of Swirl Effervescent Atomizer Spray Angle

Abstract:

Article Preview

In the application of sprays produced by an atomizer, spray angle is one of key performance parameters. A larger spray angle is often required in providing a better spray dispersion. Swirl effervescent atomizer is one of the existing atomizers with the capability to produce a large spray angle. The formation of spray angle from this atomizer however is hardly understood. A newly-designed swirl effervescent atomizer was developed and tested with different swirl-generating vane angle in order to understand the swirl intensity effect on the spray angle. Experiments were carried out based on a cold flow test approach using water as the working fluid and nitrogen gas as the atomizing agent. High-speed shadowgraph technique was deployed to record the resultant sprays produced. Video recordings, acquired using a high-speed video camera, were converted to a sequence of images for further analysis using an image processing software. It was found that the spray angle increases with the swirl-generating vane angle. Specifically, the spray angle shows an abrupt increase for the case of swirl-generating vane angle changing from 30° to 45° but visualizes only a gradual increase in the case of swirl-generating vane angle changing from 45° to 60°.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Peng-Sheng Wei

Pages:

108-111

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.607.108

Citation:

Z. A. Ghaffar et al., "Characteristics of Swirl Effervescent Atomizer Spray Angle", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 607, pp. 108-111, 2014

Online since:

July 2014

Export:

Price:

$35.00

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Ibrahim, Comprehensive Study of Internal Flow Field and Linear and Nonlinear Instability of an Annular Liquid Sheet Emanating from an Atomizer, PhD Dissertation, University of Cincinnati, (2006).

[2] Y. I. Khavkin, Theory and Practice of Swirl Atomizers. New York, USA: Taylor and Francis, (2004).

[3] ASTM, Standard E 1620-97: Standard Terminology Relating to Liquid Particles and Atomization, in Annual book of ASTM standards, ed, (2012).

[4] A. Tratnig and G. Brenn, Drop size spectra in sprays from pressure-swirl atomizers, International Journal of Multiphase Flow, vol. 36, pp.349-363, (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2010.01.008

[5] B. -J. Rho, S. -J. Kang, J. -H. Oh, and S. -G. Lee, Swirl effect on the spray characteristics of a twin-fluid jet, KSME International Journal, vol. 12, pp.899-906, (1998).

DOI: 10.1007/bf02945557

[6] J. Jedelsky and M. Jicha, Novel Modifications of Twin-fluid Atomizers: Performance, Advantages and Drawbacks, in ILASS–Europe 2010, 23rd Annual Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Brno, Czech Republic, September, (2010).

[7] A. Hussein, M. Hafiz, H. Rashid, A. Halim, W. Wisnoe, and S. Kasolang, Characteristics of Hollow Cone Swirl Spray at Various Nozzle Orifice Diameters, Jurnal Teknologi, vol. 58, (2012).

DOI: 10.1063/1.4704210

In order to see related information, you need to Login.