Basic Geometries of the New Closed Circuit Wind Tunnel of the Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)


Article Preview

The existing UPM low speed wind tunnel was usually occupied by students, who carried out their final year projects or postgraduate researches, so that there was hardly free time slot for any additional testing work. Due to this reason, a new wind tunnel project has been started recently. Some basic specifications of the new tunnel have been pre-selected before the project was started, which comprised the following design decisions: a tunnel speed of 50 m/s, a test section area of 1´1 m2, and a closed circuit tunnel type. It wouldn’t be difficult to perceive that this pre-selection was made based on some of the trade-off results among the project’s options and constraints. This paper is aimed to present a simple analysis on the design of the new tunnel, focusing only on its basic geometries. Some design decisions that have been made related to its basic geometries are analyzed and reported in this paper. This analysis may be considered as a design verification of the new tunnel or even perhaps be regarded as scientific justification for its existence.



Edited by:

R. Varatharajoo, F.I. Romli, K.A. Ahmad, D.L. Majid and F. Mustapha




S. Wiriadidjaja et al., "Basic Geometries of the New Closed Circuit Wind Tunnel of the Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 629, pp. 376-381, 2014

Online since:

October 2014




* - Corresponding Author

[1] Surjatin Wiriadidjaja et. al., Subsonic Wind Tunnels in Malaysia: A Review,. App. Mechanics & Materials (AMM), Trans Tech Public Switzerland, 225 (2012), 566-571.


[2] UPM Closed Circuit Low Speed Wind Tunnel, UPM-WT Design Data (2014).

[3] J. B. Barlow, W. H. Rae, Jr., A. Pope, Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing, third ed., Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, (1999).

[4] R. D. Mehta and P. Bradshaw, Design rules for small low speed wind tunnels, Aero. J. Royal Aero. Soc., Paper No. 718, (1979).

[5] Certification Specifications for Normal, Utility, Aerobatic and Commuter Catagory Aeroplanes, CS-23 Book 1, European Aviation Safety Agency (2012).

[6] Information on http: /www. sportpilot. org.

[7] I. H. Abbott, & Albert E. v. Doenhof, Theory of wing sections, General Publishing Company, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, (1959).

[8] A. Silverstein, Scale effect on Clark Y airfoil characteristics from NACA Full-Scale Wind Tunnel tests, Virginia, USA, (1934).

[9] Van den Berg, B, Reynolds number and Mach number effects on the maximum lift and the stalling characteristics of wings at low speeds, NLR TR 69025U-(1969).

[10] A.B. Haines, & A.D. Young, Scale Effects on Aircraft and Weapon Aerodynamics, AGARDOgraph 323, Loughton, Essex, UK, (1994).

[11] J. C. A. Van Ditshuizen & R. Ross, Aerodynamic and Aeroacoustics Design Aspects, Construction 1976-1980, Design Manufacturing Calibration of the German-Dutch Windtunnel (DNW), (1982).