Mechanical Behavior of a Calcium Phosphate Ceramic Bone Graft Used in the Rehabilitation of a C4 Human Vertebra


Article Preview

The main results of a static analysis with a finite element model of the cervical section between C3 – C5 of a human spine are reported. In this case, it is assumed that the element C4 is completely damaged and has to be replaced. Therefore, a bone graft was installed between the anterior side of C3 and C5. Besides, a cervical plate of 55 mm. was fixed at the same side with 4 expansive screws. The resultant stresses caused by compression loads were analyzed and the displacements between the graft and adjacent vertebrae were calculated. Three loading conditions were applied: 80 N, 637.5 N and 6374.5 N. The first one corresponds to the head weight. In the second case, it is assumed that the average patient weight is supported by those vertebrae, while in the last one; the compression load failure is applied on the vertebrae. Results show that displacements were lower than 3 mm between the graft and the adjacent vertebrae. In accordance with the concept of spine stability after Müller [1], the arrangement is a stable one. Another advantage is that no wires are used in this surgical technique. Two more issues should be noticed. There is no risk that the plate may be broken and the geometry of the bone graft allows bone regeneration. These results are on line with those observed in preliminary experimental tests with porcine vertebrae.



Edited by:

J. Quinta da Fonseca




J. A. Beltrán-Fernández et al., "Mechanical Behavior of a Calcium Phosphate Ceramic Bone Graft Used in the Rehabilitation of a C4 Human Vertebra", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. 7-8, pp. 101-106, 2007

Online since:

August 2007


[1] Müller, W., Manual of internal fixation. 3rd ed, Científico-Médica (1992).

[2] Yoganandan, N. & Et. al. Epidemiology and Injury biomechanics in motor vehicle related trauma to the human cervical spine, SAE 892438, pp.223-241, (1989).

[3] Huelke, D. & Et. al., Cervical injuries suffered in automotive crashes, J. Neurosurgery, 54: 316322. (1981).

[4] Thorson, J., Neck injuries in road accidents, Scand. J. Rehabilitation Med, 4, pp.110-113. (1972).

[5] Holly, L. & Et. al., Cervical spine trauma associated with moderate and severe head injury: incidence, risk factors, and injury characteristics. J Neurosurgery Spine 96: S285-91. (2002).


[6] Lowery, D, & Et. al. Epidemiology of Cervical Spine Injury in Victims, Ann. Emergency Medicine, 38 (1) 12-16. (2001).

[7] M. F. Carvajal Romero, J. Nieto Miranda, R. Rodríguez Cañizo, M. Dufoo Olvera, L. H. Hernández Gómez, G. Urriolagoitia Calderón y A. Minor Martínez. Analysis of compressive stresses on the spine with intervertebral disk injury: Numerical-experimental study on a porcine specimen, Acta Ortopédica Mexicana, vol. 19, suplement 1, S6-S10. (2005).

[8] Mattar, S., Cirugía de la columna vertebral, Cirujano de la columna, centro médico vital, Carrera 51 B No. 94 - 334, Barranquilla - Colombia. (2005).

[9] Beltrán, J., Hernández Gómez, LH, Rodríguez Cañizo, R., Urriolagoitia Calderón, G., Gonzalez Rebatú, A., Dufoo Olvera, M., Distribución de esfuerzos por la acción de cargas de compresión en la vértebra cervical C5, empleando el método del elemento finito, Científica, Vol. 9, Num 3, Julio - Septiembre, pp.135-142, México. (2005).


[10] Moore, Ch. & Et. al., The evaluation of a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic for use in grafting long-bone diaphyseal defects, J. Orthop Res, 5: 356-365. (1987).


[11] ORTOSINTESE, Products Catalogue, Rua Friedrich Von Voith, 896 - Jaragua, Brasil. (2006).

[12] Trecant & Et. Al., Influence of post-implantation phyco-chemical changes in a macroporous ceramic on its mechanical strength, Journal of Materials: Materials in Medicine 7, pp.227-229. (1996).