Integrated Energy-Controlling in Industrial Value Chains


Article Preview

The energy efficient production of goods can only be used as a unique selling proposition, if reliable values for the energy consumption, caused by production and transportation, are determinable. Furthermore, the customer must be able to compare these values for different products. Using a consistent and standardized methodology for calculating these values along the value chain, this comparability can be achieved. Providing this information, as potentially required by the end customer or by law, the penetration of this methodology could be achieved, while obviously the comparably more energy efficiently produced goods would be more attractive for the (end) customer. Consequently, an incentive system would emerge, which motivates the companies to improve their energy efficiency throughout the complete value chain. The following paper presents the above-mentioned methodology along with a unified scheme for allocating the energy consumption of the production to products.



Edited by:

Jörg Franke and Sven Kreitlein




T. Rackow et al., "Integrated Energy-Controlling in Industrial Value Chains", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 805, pp. 86-93, 2015

Online since:

November 2015




* - Corresponding Author

[1] Verein Deutscher Ingenieure e.V.: Cumulated energy demand (CED). Berlin, Wien, Zürich: Beuth, (2012).

[2] International Organization for Standardization: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Principles and framework. ISO 14040: (2006).

[3] L. Alting; B. Legart: Life Cycle Engineering and Design. In: CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 44 (1995), no. 2, p.569–580.


[5] M. Schmidt: Carbon accounting and carbon footprint – more than just diced results? In: International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management 1 (2009), no. 1, p.19–30.


[6] O. Straehle; K. Petrick; F. Stierli; A. Bron: Hidden treasure: Why energy efficiency deserves a second look. Bain & Company. München, Zürich, (2013).

[7] OTTO GmbH & Co KG: Konsumethik zwischen persönlichem Vorteil und sozialer Verantwortung: Otto Group Trendstudie 2013, 4. Studie zum ethischen Konsum. (2013).

[8] W. Arnold; J. Freimann; R. Ku: Sustainable Balanced Scorecard (SBS). In: Zeitschrift für Controlling & Management ZfCM 47 (2003), Nr. 6, p.391–400.

[9] J. Horsch: Kostenrechnung. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien, (2015).

[10] T. Rackow; T. Javied; T. Geith; P. Schuderer; J. Franke: Energy Controlling - Analysis and Evaluation of Energy Measuring Equipment for the Purpose of Energy Transparency in Production Plants. In: Jörg Franke; Sven Kreitlein (Hrsg. ): Green Factory Bavaria Colloquium 2014. Switzerland: Trans Tech Publications, 2014 (655), p.35.


[11] T. Rackow; T. Javied; T. Donhauser; C. Martin; P. Schuderer; J. Franke: Green Cockpit: Transparency on Energy Consumption in Manufacturing Companies. In: Procedia CIRP 26 (2015), p.498–503.