Mega Floats: Floating Offshore Remote Terminal (FORT) towards Sustainability Life Cycle Assessment


Article Preview

The life cycle model of Mega Float: Floating offshore fishing terminal (FORT) for deep sea fishing industry is presented in this paper. FORT is a totally new concept of a mega float for deep sea fishing application. It is aimed at increasing productivity through reducing travelling time to fishing ground by providing critical support services such as loading and unloading and minor maintenance and repair of boat and equipment at sea close to the fishing ground. The immediate concern is surely on its life cycle cost and techno-economic viability. The system is huge and remotely located far offshore and hence the element of sustainability and environmental friendliness and safety are some of the major investment issues. Immediate cost consideration includes the relatively high initial/acquisition cost and operation and maintenance costs and the intention is to at least self-sufficient by generation income from the services offered. Therefore, hybrid algorithm of cash flow and life cost cycle is applied in FORT implementation. The new derivation of the mathematical model for FORT application is developed to life cycle assessment principle [1-3]. The algorithm requires data that could be best produced based on forecast demand and projected cost. For ease of use the lengthy algorithm will be presented in a computer-based package.



Edited by:

Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Rafiza Abd Razak, Muhammad Mahyiddin Ramli, Shayfull Zamree Abd Rahim, Rizalafande Che Ismail and Mohd Nasir Mat Saad




A. Abdul Malik et al., "Mega Floats: Floating Offshore Remote Terminal (FORT) towards Sustainability Life Cycle Assessment", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 815, pp. 332-337, 2015

Online since:

November 2015




[1] Barringer, H.P. A Life Cycle Cost Summary, in: International Conference on Maintenance Societies, Perth, Australia (2003).

[2] Reddy, V.R., M. Kurian, and R. Ardakanian, in: Life-cycle Cost Approach (LCCA): Framework and Concepts, in Life-cycle Cost Approach for Management of Environmental Resources, Chapter 2, Springer (2015).


[3] Gitman, L.J., R. Juchau, and J. Flanagan in: Principles of managerial finance, Pearson Higher Education AU (2010).

[4] Stobutzki, I., et al.: Fish. Res. Vol. 78(2) (2006), p.130.

[5] McClanahan, T., E.H. Allison, and J.E. Cinner: Fish and Fisheries Vol. 16(1) (2015), p.78.

[6] Gross, M.: Current Biology Vol. 25(6) (2015), p. R209.

[7] Prescott, J., et al. in: Governance and Governability: The Small-Scale Purse Seine Fishery in Pulau Rote, Eastern Indonesia, in Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries, Springer (2015).


[8] Garces, L., et al.: Fish. Res. Vol. 78(2) (2006), p.119.

[9] Hiew, K., J. Saad, and N. Gopinath in: Coral Triangle Initiative: ecosystem approach to fisheries management (EAFM): country position paper-Malaysia, Honolulu, Hawaii: The USAID Coral (2012).

[10] Kimball, L.: International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law Vol. 19 (2004), p.259.

[11] Lim, G.T. and M. Hussein: Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. Vol. 5(12) (2011), p.1518.

[12] Sabki, A., et al. in: Offshore fishing vessel research vessel's repair and operation project. (1998).

[13] A Karim, N., et al.: Malaysian Journal of Nutrition Vol. 14(1) (2008), p.25.

[14] A.M., A., in: Large Offshore Floating Terminal. MIMET Technical Bulletin Vol. 2(1) (2011), p.29.

[15] Douglas, L.: Eng. Technol. Vol. 8(6) (2013), p.62.

[16] Van Luyn, F. -J. in: A floating city of peasants: the great migration in contemporary China, New Press. (2008).

[17] Barltrop, N.D., Floating Structures: a guide for design and analysis. Vol. 1. 1998: Oilfield Pubns Inc.

[18] Evans, J.H.: Journal of the American Society for Naval Engineers Vol. 71(4) (1959), p.671.

[19] Olsen, B.T., et al.: Network IEEE 20(4) (2006), p.6.

[20] Loisel, R., et al.: Int. J. Hydrogen Energy Vol. 40(21) (2015), p.6727.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.