The Damping Mechanism of Steel-Rubber Composite Beam under Flexural Dynamic Excitation

Abstract:

Article Preview

Damping is one of the several important parameters in the dynamic system. It reduces amplitude response of a structure, especially around the resonance. The higher the damping, the better the performance (more comfort, lower stress, less fatigue), and the longer the life cycle of the structure will be. There are many types of damper amongst other is the tuned mass damper (TMD), where mass and spring are designed in such that the TMD frequency is close to the natural frequency of the structure in question where the phase angle is about 180 degree out of phase. Applying steel-rubber composite beam as a damper in the TMD system is expected to increase the damping of the structure of interest. The objective of this study is to test experimentally and numerically the dynamic parameters of the rubber-steel composite beam upon a cantilever support system under static load-displacement test and flexural dynamic excitation. The addition of steel (in the form of wire mesh) embedded in the rubber beam significantly increases the stiffness, but the damping ratio, at a small range of displacement. The effectiveness of rubber material in the steel-rubber composite beam is expected when large displacement occurs, meaning that more energy dissipation and larger damping ratio. The established numerical model is able to generate dynamic parameters close to results of the experimental model, but the damping ratios.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Djoko Legono, Radianta Triatmaja, Prof. Priyosulistyo, Veerasak Likhitruangsilp, Lim Pang Zen, Teuku Faisal Fathani, Ali Awaludin, Intan Supraba, Imam Muthohar, Dr. Endita, Fikri Faris and Dr. Inggar Septhia Irawati

Pages:

98-105

Citation:

H. Priyosulistyo et al., "The Damping Mechanism of Steel-Rubber Composite Beam under Flexural Dynamic Excitation", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 881, pp. 98-105, 2018

Online since:

May 2018

Export:

Price:

$38.00

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B.S. Ben, B.A. Ben, Adarsh K, K.A. Vikram, Ch. Ratnam, Damping measurement in composite materials using combined finite element and frequency response method, J. Eng Sci (IJESI). (2013) 89-97.

[2] C.W. de Silva, Vibration Damping, Control, and Design, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London, (2007).

[3] H. Mevada, D. Patel, Experimental Determination of Structural Damping of Different, 12th International Conference on Vibration Problem, ICOVP, Guwahati, (2015).

[4] D.R. Teruna, T.A. Majid, B. Budiono, Experimental study of hysteretic steel damper for energy dissipation capacity, Advanced in Civil Engineering. 2015 (2015) 1-12.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/631726

[5] L. Dong, R. Lakes, Advanced damper with high stiffness and high hysteresis damping based on negative structural stiffness. J. Solid and Structure. 50 (2013) 2416-2423.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.03.018

[6] J. Kim, S. Bang, Optimum distribution of added viscoelastic dampers for mitigation of torsional responses of plan-wise asymmetric structures, Eng. Struct. 24 (2002) 1257-1269.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0141-0296(02)00046-9

[7] M.L. Lai, P. Lu, D.A. Lunsford, K. Kasai, K.C. Chang, Viscoelastic Damper: A Damper With Linear or Nonlinear Material, World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, (1996).

[8] Information on http://abaqusdoc.ucalgary.ca/books/stm/default.htm?startat=ch02s05ath27.html.

[9] B.P. Baillargeon, S.S. Vel, J.S. Koplik, Utilizing ABAQUS to Analyze the Active Vibration Suppression of Structural Systems, ABAQUS User's Conference, Boston, (2014).

[10] ABAQUS, ABAQUS Analysis User's Manual Volume III: Materials, Version 6.4, ABAQUS Inc., Pawtucket, (2003).