Comparison of Spherical and Non-Spherical Objects in Cyclonic and Uniaxial Flow Regimes

Abstract:

Article Preview

This paper uses the Muschelknautz method to model the cyclone separation of chestnut shell and kernel fragments simulated as a square plate and sphere respectively. Because of the opposing geometry of the kernel and shell particles, a new framework is derived using CFD simulations to predict the drag coefficient of the shell particle as a function of orientation and Reynolds number. The drag coefficient of the shell is approximately proportional to the sine of the orientation angle, squared. Despite this, particle orientation remains relatively constant for all practical geometric and velocity parameters within a cyclone, as implied by the assumptions used in this paper. The results from the separation model show that the tangential velocity is almost 86 times greater than the radial velocity of the particle beneath the vortex finder. Consequently, the full frontal area of the particle is not exposed to the radial flow and the particles are not separated effectively by drag force. An experimental separation efficiency of 28.5% compared to an efficiency of 0% predicted by classical cyclone theory, indicates that the shell particles could be re-entrained at the base of the cyclone. This suggests that cyclones do not utilise the differences in drag between particles. The simulation of chestnut kernel and shell particles in a uniaxial flow field (such as occurs in pneumatic separation) shows that it is theoretically possible to achieve a significantly larger separation efficiency when compared to cyclones.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Leandro Bolzoni

Pages:

93-104

Citation:

T. Archbold and J. K. Carson, "Comparison of Spherical and Non-Spherical Objects in Cyclonic and Uniaxial Flow Regimes", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 884, pp. 93-104, 2018

Online since:

August 2018

Export:

Price:

$38.00

* - Corresponding Author

[1] D. Klinac, 2000, Chestnuts worldwide and in New Zealand, Information on http://www.nzcc.org.nz/factsheet.html (Accessed on 12 April 2017).

[2] J. Dirgo, D. Leith, Cyclone collection efficiency: Comparison of experimental results with theoretical predictions, Aerosol Science and Technology. 4 (1985) 401-415.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02786828508959066

[3] A.C. Hoffmann, L.E. Stein, Gas cyclones and swirl tubes: Principles, design and operation, New York: Springer, Berlin, (2002).

[4] K. Elsayed, Analysis and optimization of cyclone separators geometry using RANS and LES methodologies, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, (2011).

[5] M.K. Lenzi, E.K. Lenzi, Spreadsheet for cyclone and hydrocyclone design considering nonspherical particle geometry, Computer Applications in Engineering Education. 15 (2007) 134-142.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20102

[6] M. Zastawny, G. Mallouppas, F. Zhao, B.van Wachem, Derivation of drag and lift force and torque coefficients for non-spherical particles in flows, International Journal of Multiphase Flow. 39 (2012) 227-239.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2011.09.004

[7] E. Findlay, Chestnut shell separation using cyclone separators, The University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand, 2013 (Unpublished).

[8] ANSYS, 2016, ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Information on https://www.sharcnet.ca/Software/Ansys/17.0/en-us/help/flu_th/flu_th.html (Accessed on 3 July 2017).

[9] Y.A. Cengel, J.M. Cimbala, Fluid mechanics: Fundamentals and applications, first ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, (2006).

[10] A. Mokhtari Nahal, A. Arabhosseini, M.H. Kianmehr, Separation of shelled walnut particles using pneumatic method, International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 6 (2013) 88-93.