Simulation of Guided Waves Propagation in Axial Transmission Measurements in Human Radius


Article Preview

This paper is a brief review of the axial transmission measurements methodology. Theoretical background and description of the methodology is presented. Simulations made to verify some of the statements found in the scientific literature about the subject matter are described. Simulation performed were meant to be a basis for specifying parameters of the experimental set up to be used in the future. Three dimensional finite difference code was used to simulate wave propagation in human radius. Two models have been prepared to compare the results. One was an idealized geometry of the diaphysis of human radius and second was a reconstructed anatomical geometry from scans acquired with Computed Tomography (CT). Conclusions about the wave propagation character and feasibility of low frequency measurements in medical diagnostics are discussed.



Edited by:

Tadeusz Uhl and Andrzej Chudzikiewicz




Ł. Pieczonka et al., "Simulation of Guided Waves Propagation in Axial Transmission Measurements in Human Radius", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 9, pp. 127-141, 2008

Online since:

October 2007




[1] R. Będziński: Engineering Biomechanics, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, 1997 (in Polish).

[2] E. Bossy, M. Talmant, P. Laugier: Effect of bone cortical thickness on velocity measurements using ultrasonic axial transmission: A 2D simulation study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112 (1), pp.297-307, (2002).


[3] E. Bossy, M. Talmant, P. Laugier: Three-dimensional simulations of ultrasonic axial transmission velocity measurement on cortical bone models. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115 (5), pp.2314-2324, (2005).


[4] E. Bossy et. al.: An in vitro study of the ultrasonic axial transmission technique at the radius: 1MHz velocity measurements are sensitive to both mineralization and intracortical porosity. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, 19 (9), pp.1548-1556, (2004).


[5] J. D. Currey: Bones: Structure and Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, (2002).

[6] CyberLogic Inc.: Wave 3000 Pro User's Guide, New York, (2006).

[7] V. Giurgiutiu, A. Cuc: Embedded Non-destructive Evaluation for Structural Health Monitoring, Damage Detection, and Failure Prevention. The Shock and Vibration Digest, 37 (2), pp.83-105, (2005).


[8] C. Gluer et. al.: Association of five quantitative ultrasound devices and bone densitometry with osteoporotic vertebral fractures in a population-based sample: The OPUS study. Journal Of Bone And Mineral Research, 19 (5), (2004).


[9] T. Kundu: Ultrasonic Nondestructive Evaluation: Engineering and Biological Material Characterization. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, (2004).

[10] B.C. Lee, M. Palacz, M. Krawczuk, W. Ostachowicz, W.J. Staszewski: Wave propagation in a sensor/actuator diffusion bond model. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 276, pp.671-687, (2004).


[11] K. I. Lee, S. W. Yoon: Feasibility of bone assessment with leaky Lamb waves in bone phantoms and a bovine tibia. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115 (6), pp.3210-3217, (2000).


[12] F. Lefebvre, Y. Deblock, C. Campistron, D. Ahite, J.J. Fabre: Development of a new ultrasonic technique for bone and biomaterials in vitro characterization. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 63 (4), pp.441-446, (2002).


[13] G. Lowet, G. Van der Perre: Ultrasound velocity measurement in long bones: measurement method and simulation of ultrasound wave propagation. Journal of Biomechanics, 19, p.12551262, (1996).


[14] G. Luo et. al.: Computational methods for ultrasonic bone assessment. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 25 (5), pp.823-830, (1999).

[15] Mathworks Inc.: Matlab Manuals, (2003).

[16] P. Moilanen et. al.: Assessment of the tibia using ultrasonic guided waves in pubertal girls. Osteoporosis Int., 14, pp.1020-1027, (2003).

[17] P. Moilanen et. al.: The role of soft tissue in ultrasonic guided wave measurement in bone. WCU 2003, Paris, September 7 - 10, (2003).

[18] P. Moilanen et. al.: Thickness sensitivity of ultrasound velocity in long bone phantoms. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 30 (11), pp.1517-1521, (2004).


[19] M. Muller et. al.: Comparison of three ultrasonic axial transmission methods for bone assessment. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 31 (5), pp.633-642, (2005).

[20] Panametrics Inc.: Ultrasonic Transducers Catalog, www. panametrics-ndt. com, (2005).

[21] B. Pavlakovic, M. Lowe: Disperse: A system for generating dispersion curves User's Guide. Version 2. 0. 16B, London, (2003).

[22] K. Raum et. al.: Bone microstructure and elastic tissue properties are reflected in QUS axial transmission measurements. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol., 31 (9), pp.1225-1235, (2005).


[23] J. -Y. Rho, Y.T. Ting, G.M. Pharr: Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. Biomaterials, 18, pp.1325-1330, (1997).


[24] J. -Y. Rho, P. Zioupos, J.D. Currey, G.M. Pharr: Microstructural elasticity and regional heterogeneity in human femoral bone of various ages examined by nanoindentation. Journal of Biomechanics, 35, pp.189-198, (2002).


[25] J. -Y. Rho, L. Kuhn-Spearing, P. Zioupos: Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. Medical Engineering & Physics, 20, pp.92-102, (1998).


[26] W. J. Staszewski: Structural health monitoring using guided ultrasonic waves. Advances in Smart Technologies in Structural Engineering, pp.117-162, Springer Verlag, (2004).


[27] W. Ostachowicz, M. Krawczuk: Damage detection of structures using spectral element method. Advances in Smart Technologies in Structural Engineering, pp.69-88, Springer Verlag, (2004).