An Empirical Study on E-Commerce Channel Relationships: With the Help of Interdependence Theory

Abstract:

Article Preview

The purpose of this article is to explore the effect of the perceived goal interdependence between distributors with suppliers on e-commerce channel relationships. With the help of interdependence theory, the conceptual model of goal interdependence and distributor interests was developed. Cooperative goals, competitive goals and independent goals were used to explain the outcome variable, economic satisfaction and occupational well-being. The moderating effects of three variables were considered: commitment, trust and specific investments. The hypotheses were tested through a sample survey among more than 1,000 computer distributors in Chengdu, China. Results indicate that distributor cooperative goals positively influence distributor commitment, trust and specific investments, sequentially increases distributor economic satisfaction and occupational well-being. Results are interpreted that distributor cooperative goals is an important contributors for developing successful e-commerce channel relationships.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Xuejun Zhou

Pages:

842-847

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.99-100.842

Citation:

Y. Wang and X. F. Tang, "An Empirical Study on E-Commerce Channel Relationships: With the Help of Interdependence Theory", Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vols. 99-100, pp. 842-847, 2011

Online since:

September 2011

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] Anderson and Narus, Journal of Marketing, 54(January), 1990, 42-58.

[2] Cannon and Christain Homburg (2001), Journal of Marketing, 65(January), 29–43.

[3] Deutsch, M., the Resolution of Conflict, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, (1973).

[4] Feng Chen Y., Tjosvold D., Journal of Management Studies, December 2006,P1727-1752.

[5] Geyskens I., and Steenkamp J E M., Journal of Retailing, Volume 76(1), 2000, 11–32.

[6] Ghosh, M and George J, Journal of Marketing, 63 (Special Issue), 1999, 131–45.

[7] Janssen, Van de Vliert , E, and Veenstra, C, Journal of Management, 1999, Vol. 25. No-2. 117. 142.

[8] Jap, Sandy D., Journal of Marketing Research, 1999, 36 (November), 461–75.

[9] Jöreskog. Jean L., Tomoaki Sorbom, Joseph A. Cote and Naoto Onzo, Journal of Marketing, vol. 57, April 1993, p.1–10.

[10] Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S. D, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58 No. 3, 1994, pp.20-38.

[11] Palmatier, Robert W., Rajiv P. Dant, Dhruv Grewal, and Kenneth R. Evans, Journal of Marketing, 2006, 70 (October), 156–53.

DOI: 10.1509/jmkg.70.4.136

[12] Sparr J L and Sonnentag S, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 2008, 17 (2), 198 – 225.

[13] Tjosvold D., Halco J A., Journal of Social Psychology, 1991, 132(5), 629-639.

[14] Tjosvold, D. and Choy Wong, Journal of Marketing Management,1994, 10., 297-310.

[15] Rokkan A, Heide J and Wathne K, Journal of Marketing Research Vol. XL (May 2003), 210-224.

[16] Ryff, C. D. and Keyes, C. L. M. , Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1995, 719–727.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.