Validation of Numerical Simulation Method for Active Flow Control Technology


Article Preview

The numerical simulation method of active flow control technology was studied in this paper. The simplified mathematical model of the active flow control is established with unsteady velocity boundary condition at the specific location of model surface. The reliability of flow control model was verified by standard cases of CFDVAL2004, and the capability of capturing micro-jet flow characteristics for Spalart-Allmaras (SA) and Menter’s Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model were analyzed. The results showed that the accuracy of SA turbulence model is better than the SST model, and flow control model meet the accuracy requirements for numerical simulation method.



Edited by:

Dashnor Hoxha, Francisco E. Rivera and Ian McAndrew




X. P. Xu and Z. Zhou, "Validation of Numerical Simulation Method for Active Flow Control Technology", Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 1016, pp. 694-699, 2014

Online since:

August 2014




* - Corresponding Author

[1] Scott G. Ander, William L. Sellers Ⅲ, and Anthony E. Washburn. Active Flow Control Activities at NASA Langley. AIAA 2004-2623.


[2] Thomas R. Bewley. Flow control: new challenges for a new Renaissance. Progress in Aerospace Science. 37(2001), pp.21-58.


[3] S. S. Ravindran. Active Control of Flow Separation Over an Airfoil. NASA/TM-1999-209838.

[4] Ahmed A. Hassan and Ram D. JanakiRam. Effects of zero-mass synthetic, jets on the aerodynamics of the NACA-0012 airfoil. AIAA 97-2326.


[5] Xu X P, Zhu X P, Zhou Z, et al. Further exploring CFD-based gust response and gust alleviation. Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University. 28(6) 2010, pp.818-823.

[6] J Cui, R K Agarwal. CFD Validation of Turbulent Separation Control on a 2D Hump (NASA Langley Workshop Validation: Case 3), AIAA 2005-5013.


[7] Rumsey C L. Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Analysis of Zero Efflux Flow Control over a Hump Model. AIAA 2006-1114.