Degradation Characteristic of Strontium-Containing Calcium Phosphate Cement In Vivo

Abstract:

Article Preview

The objective of this study is to compare the degradation of three strontium-containing calcium phosphate cement (Sr-CPC) and one calcium phosphate cement without strontium (CPC) in vivo. Three Sr-CPCs, containing 1%, 5%, 10% strontium respectively, and a CPC without strontium were tested in this study. The specimens in rod-shape (2 mm  6 mm) were prepared, and were implanted in the erector spine muscle of 15 New Zealand rabbits. After 4, 8 and 12 weeks, 5 rabbits were sacrificed respectively and the specimens were taken out, cleaned, dryed and weighed. The weight losses of the specimens were calculated and the data were analyzed by ANOVA. The results showed that the CPC containing 5%, 10% strontium showed obviously higher degradation rates at the three observation periods than that containing 1% strontium and that without strontium (P<0.05). Addition of 1% strontium into CPC did not increase degradation rate (P>0.05), and the CPC containing 5% and 10% strontium showed no difference in degradation rate at the three observation periods (P>0.05).

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 105-106)

Edited by:

Wei Pan and Jianghong Gong

Pages:

553-556

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.105-106.553

Citation:

X. Y. Zhao et al., "Degradation Characteristic of Strontium-Containing Calcium Phosphate Cement In Vivo ", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 105-106, pp. 553-556, 2010

Online since:

April 2010

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] W.E. Brown and L.C. Chow: In: Brown PW, editor. Cements research progress. Westervillie, OH: American Ceramic Society; 1986. pp.352-379.

[2] W.E. Brown and L.C. Chow: USA Patent 4612053(1986).

[3] B.R. Constantz, B.M. Barr, I.C. Ison, et al.: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 43 (1998), p.451.

[4] C.D. Friedman, P.D. Constantino and K. Jones: Arch. Otolaryngol. Head. Neck. Surg. Vol. 117 (1991), p.385.

[5] P.D. Constantino, C.D. Friedman and R Jones: Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Vol. 90 (1992), p.174.

[6] M.E. Curzon:J. Dent. Res. Vol. 62 (1983), p.96.

[7] J. Christoffersen, M.R. Christoffersen and N. Kolthoff: Bone Vol. 20 (1997), p.47.

[8] S.E. Gruninger, C Siew, L.C. Chow, et al.: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 63 (1984), p.200.

[9] O. Shik: Biomed. Mater. Eng. Vol. 1 (1991), p.13.

[10] R.Z. Le Geros, R. Kijkowska, M. Tung, et al.: Tooth enamel V. Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium (Florence Publishers, Yokohama, 1989), p.393.

[11] S. Okayama, M. Akao, S. Nakamura, et al.: Biomed. Mater. Vol. 1 (1991), p.11.

[12] D.M. Chen, Y.F. Fu and G.Z. Gu: Chin. J. Biomed. Eng. Vol. 20 (2003), p.278.

[13] E. Canalis, M. Hott, P. DeloPre, et al.: Bone Vol. 18 (1996), p.517.

[14] D. Guo, K. Xu and Y. Han: J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Vol. 86A (2008), p.947.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.