Adobe Bricks: The Best Eco-Friendly Building Material

Abstract:

Article Preview

Durable, renewable, and affordable are the three characteristics of the adobe brick, one of the widely used construction material in human civilization, but is always neglected. Traditionally, price has been the foremost consideration when comparing similar materials or materials designated for the same function. That is why by the post-war period, the concrete was adopted as a universal building material in response of the massive housing demand. The intergovernmental concerns never took into consideration both the sustainability factor and the cultural one, not until the 1990s when research on climate change expanded and the sustainable development took an important place in the different academic cross fields: engineering, biology, technology and architecture. The main focus by then was the reduction the CO2 gas emissions emitted by the building sector which is now approximately 30% of the global energy-related. Researchers are focusing on creating a completely new green eco-material an alternative to the concrete, but in this paper, I will demonstrate why is it worth to reinvigorate centuries-old eco-construction material. Adobe bricks are currently the best choice to built affordable housings in response to the chronicle demand. Not only they have a track record that makes their thermal mass performance easier to evaluate, but also they can last 400 years or more when properly maintained. Comparatively, new technologies require testing over time to determine their long-range effectiveness.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Hao Gong and K.M. Gupta

Pages:

386-390

Citation:

D. Benghida, "Adobe Bricks: The Best Eco-Friendly Building Material", Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 1105, pp. 386-390, 2015

Online since:

May 2015

Authors:

Export:

Price:

$38.00

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Minke, G., Manual de construcción para viviendas antisísmicas de tierra. Forschungslabor für Experimentelles Bauen , Universidad de Kassel, Germany, (2001).

[2] Zhai, Z., Previtali, J. M., Ancient vernacular architecture: Characteristics categorization and energy performance evaluation. Energy and Buildings 42, 357-365, (2010).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.10.002

[3] Sheweka, S., Using Bricks as a Temporary Solution for Gaza Reconstruction, Energy Procedia, Elsevier Ltd, 236-240, (2011).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.05.027

[4] Bentz D , Quenard D, Kunzel H, Baruchel J, Martys N, Garboczi E. Microstructure and transport properties of porous building materials. Three-dimensional X-ray tomographic studies. J. Mater. Struct., 33 : 147-153, (2000).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02479408

[5] Clifton, J. R., Robbins, C. R., Brown P. W., Adobe. II: Factors Affecting the Durability of Adobe Structures, Studies in Conservation, Maney Publishing. 24, No. 1 : 23-39. (1979).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.1979.003

[6] Clifton, J. R., Robbins, C. R., Brown P. W., Adobe. I: The Properties of Adobe, Studies in Conservation, Maney Publishing. 23, No. 4: 139-146, (1978).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1505842

[7] Morton, T., Stevenson, F., Taylor, B., Smith, N. C., Low Cost Earth Brick Construction Monitoring and Evaluation, Arc. Architects, UK, (2005).