The Influence of Mismatch Effect on the High Cycle Fatigue Resistance of High Strength Steel Welded Joints


Article Preview

The objective of this article is to present the newest results of our research work related to the high cycle fatigue resistance of advanced high strength steels. In order to determine and compare the fatigue resistance, high cycle fatigue (HCF) tests were performed on two strength categories (S690 and S960) of high strength steels including quenched and tempered (Q+T) and thermomechanical (TM) types. During the HCF tests base materials and their welded joints were investigated at different mismatch conditions (matching, undermatching, overmatching). Measured and analysed data about base materials and welded joints were compared and discussed. Statistical approach was applied during the preparation and the evaluation of the investigations, which increased their reliability. The parameters of the HCF design curves were calculated based on the Japanese testing method (JSME S 002-1981) which uses 14 specimens. During the evaluation the results were compared with each other and with literary data. According to the presented examinations the HCF resistance of the base materials is more advantageous than the welded joints. The TM steel indicated better fatigue resistance than the quenched and tempered one of the same category. The matching problem had influence on the HCF resistance of high strength steels, depending on the strength category and the steel type.



Edited by:

Nicușor Alin Sîrbu and Aurel Valentin Bîrdeanu




Á. Dobosy et al., "The Influence of Mismatch Effect on the High Cycle Fatigue Resistance of High Strength Steel Welded Joints", Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 1146, pp. 73-83, 2018

Online since:

April 2018




* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Balogh, Á. Dobosy, G. Frigyik, M. Gáspár, L. Kuzsella, J. Lukács, Á. Meilinger, Gy. Nagy, D. Pósalaky, L. Prém, I. Török: Weldability and the properties of welded joints (In Hungarian), (Editors) A. Balogh, J. Lukács, I. Török, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, 2015, 324 p. (ISBN 978-963-358-081-3).

[2] EN 1993-1-1: 2009: EUROCODE 3: Design of steel structures. part 1-1: General rules and rules for buildings.

[3] Stephens R. I., Fatemi A., Stephens R. R., Fuchs H. O.: Metal Fatigue in Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001. (ISBN 0-471-51059-9).

[4] BS 7910: 2013+A1: 2015: Guide to methods for assessing the acceptability of flaws in metallic structures The British Standards Institution 2015. Published by BSI Standards Limited 2015. (ISBN 978 0 580 89564 7).

[5] Barsom J. M., Rolfe S. T.: Fracture and Fatigue Control in Structures: Applications of Fracture Mechanics. ASTM manual series: MNL41. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Consthohocken, PA, 1999. (ISBN 0-8031-2082-6).


[6] IIW-1823-07: Recommendations for fatigue design of welded joints and components, International Institute of Welding, USA, (2008).

[7] Steel: a key partner in the European low-carbon economy of tomorrow. European Steel Technology Platform (ESTEP), Brussels, March 2009, pp.1-16.

[8] R. Willms: High strength steel for steel constructions, Nordic Steel Construction Conference, electronic publication, 2009, pp.597-604.

[9] Metals Handbook, Volume 6.: Welding, Brazing and Soldering, ASM International, USA, (1995).

[10] Collin, P., Möller, M., Nilsson, M., Törnblom, S.: Undermatching butt welds in high strength steels, DOI: 10. 2749/222137809796078829, (2009).

[11] M. Fiedler, R. Rauch, R. Schnitzer, W. Ernst, G. Simader, J. Wagner: The Alfrom welding system. The world first system for high-strength welded structures, IIW 2015 International Conference Programme High Strength Steels - Challenges and Applications, Helsinki, Finland, 2015. 07. 02 - 2015. 07. 03, Paper: IIW-2015-0704, p.5.

[12] Wang, Y.: Optimizing weld integritiy for high-strength steels, Advanced Welding and Joining Technical Workshop, Boulder, USA, (2009).

[13] J. Lukács, Gy. Nagy, I. Harmati, F. R. Koritárné, Zs. K. Kuzsella: Extracts from the integrity of engineering structures (In Hungarian), (Editor) J. Lukács, University of Miskolc, Miskolc, 2012. 334. p. (ISBN 978-963-358-000-4).

[14] I. Marines-García, D. Galván-Montiel, C. Bathias: Fatigue life assessment of high-strength, low-alloy steel at high frequency. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Vol. 33, No. 1B, April 2008, pp.237-247.

[15] H. Nakazawa, S. Kodama: Statistical S-N testing method with 14 specimens: JSME standard method for determination of S-N curves. Statistical research on fatigue and fracture. Current Japanese materials research – Vol. 2. Eds.: Tanaka, T., Nishijima, S., Ichikawa, M., Elsevier Applied Science and The Society of Materials Science, Japan, 1987. pp.59-69.

[16] R. J. M. Pijper, M. H. Kolstein, A. Romeij, F. S. K. Bijlaard: Fatigue experiments on very high strength steel base material and transverse butt welds. Advanced Steel Construction, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2007, pp.14-32.

[17] U. Hamme, J. Hauser, A. Kern, U. Schriever: Einsatz hochfester Baustähle im Mobilkranbau. Stahlbau, Vol. 69, No. 4, 2000, pp.295-305.


Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.