Economical Considerations over 3D Printing Components for Abrasive Water Jet Machinery

Abstract:

Article Preview

The purpose of this research is to analyse the technological and economical aspects of making 3D print pieces to produce functional parts and subassemblies for abrasive waterjet processing equipment. The authors of this paper intend to make a clarification on the technological and economic approaches of material that can be used to make such a reference in terms of economic efficiency and technology. In the paper are analysed all the aspects involved in generating the necessary elements on the mechanical side of them by FDM (Fused Deposition Modelling). The paper is structured in a five chapters in which it is presented in a logical order the analysis of the materials that can be used in the mentioned technological field, the technological parameters specific to the analysed process, the method of generating the parts and their realization from a practical point of view and presenting the main economic aspects that involve the manufacturing costs of specific parts through 3D printing technology for components of water jet processing equipment with suspension abrasive media.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Nicușor Alin Sîrbu and Aurel Valentin Bîrdeanu

Pages:

84-91

Citation:

M. D. Vasilescu et al., "Economical Considerations over 3D Printing Components for Abrasive Water Jet Machinery", Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 1146, pp. 84-91, 2018

Online since:

April 2018

Export:

Price:

$38.00

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Todd Letcher, Megan Waytashek, Material Property Testing of 3D-Printed Specimen in PLA on an Entry-Level 3D Printer, Proceedings of the ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exposition IMECE2014 November 14-20, 2014, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/imece2014-39379

[2] Grzegorz Ćwikła, Cezary Grabowik, Krzysztof Kalinowski, Piotr OciepkaThe influence of printing parameters on selected mechanical properties of FDM/FFF 3D-printed parts, 2017 IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 227 012033.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/227/1/012033

[3] W. J. Sames, F. A. List, S. Pannala, R. R. Dehoff, S. S. Babu: The metallurgy and processing science of metal additive manufacturing, in International Materials Reviews, pag. 1-46, (2016).

[4] ** - FDM Technology 3D print durable parts with real thermoplastic, http: /www. stratasys. com/3d-printers/technologies/fdm-technology, access 09/(2017).

[5] ** - SLM (Selective Laser Melting) 3D Printing Metal, https: /www. sculpteo. com/en/ glossary/selective-laser-melting-definition/, access 09/(2017).

[6] ** - Stereolithography, http: /www. materialise. com/en/manufacturing/3d-printing-technology/stereolithography, access 09/(2017).

[7] Goldy Katal, Nelofar Tyagi, Ashish Joshi, Digital Light Processing and its Future Applications, International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 3, Issue 4, April 2013, pag. 1997 – (2004).

[8] ** Laser Sintering, http: /www. materialise. com/en/manufacturing/3d-printing-technology/laser-sintering, access 09/(2017).

[9] ** Dense plastic parts produced with Binder Jetting, https: /www. 3printr. com/dense-plastic-parts-produced-binder-jetting-0344550/, access 09/(2017).

[10] M. Feygin, B. Hsieh LAMINAlED OBJECT MANUFACTURING (LOM): A SIMPLER PROCESS, https: /sffsymposium. engr. utexas. edu/Manuscripts/1991/1991-16-Feygin. pdf, access 09/(2017).

[11] Dr. Thomas Büsgen: Plastics for Additive Manufacturing, in 20th November 2013, 3D Printing & Additive Manufacturing Industrial Applications Summit 2013, London.

[12] Comparison of typical 3D printing materials http: /2015. igem. org/wiki/images/2/24/CamJIC-Specs-Strength. pdf, access 09/(2017).

[13] ** https: /www. makeitfrom. com/material-properties/Polylactic-Acid-PLA-Polylactide, access 09/(2017).

[14] ** https: /www. makeitfrom. com/material-properties/Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Styrene-ABS, access 09/(2017).

[15] ** https: /www. m-ep. co. jp/en/pdf/product/iupi_nova/physicality_06. pdf, access 09/(2017).

[16] Wei Ling Tham, and other Characterization of Water Absorption of Biodegradable Poly(lactic Acid)/Halloysite Nanotube Nanocomposites at Different Temperatures, http: /web. usm. my/jes/ 12_2016/JES%20Vol. %2012%202016%20-%20Art. %202(13-25). pdf, access 09/(2017).

[17] ** https: /www. makeitfrom. com/material-properties/Glycol-Modified-Polyethylene-Terephthalate-PETG-PET-G, access 09/(2017).

[18] ** http: /www. zero-tek. com/en/pdf/PA-RP13S%20MATERIAL%20(SLS). pdf, access 09/(2017).

[19] Marcus Morrissette What is the 3D Printing vs Injection Molding Cost-per-Unit Breakeven?, https: /www. xometry. com/blog/3d-printing-vs-injection-molding-breakeven, access 09/(2017).

[20] Jason King The True Cost of Running a Desktop 3D Printer, http: /3dprinthq. com/cost-running-desktop-3d-printer/, access 09/(2017).

[21] Marcus Morrissette Comparing 3D Printing Processes, https: /www. xometry. com/blog/3d-printing-processes, access 09/(2017).

[22] ** What is Selective Laser Sintering? An Introductory Guide to SLS 3D Printing, https: /formlabs. com/blog/what-is-selective-laser-sintering/, access 09/(2017).

[23] ** Turning filament into industrial-strength parts, http: /www. materialise. com/en/ manufacturing/3d-printing-technology/fused-deposition-modeling, access 09/(2017).

[24] ** SELECTIVE LASER MELTING MACHINE SLM 125, https: /slm-solutions. com/ products/machines/selective-laser-melting-machine-slm-125, access 09/(2017).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100433-3.00004-x

[25] ** https: /www. 3dhubs. com/knowledge-base/industrial-fdm-vs-desktop-fdm#production_ capabilities_and_cost, access 09/(2017).

[26] **Stereolithography, http: /www. materialise. com/en/manufacturing/3d-printing-technology/ stereolithography, access 09/(2017).

[27] Kaufui V. Wong and Aldo Hernandez A Review of Additive Manufacturing, International Scholarly Research Network ISRN Mechanical Engineering, Volume 2012, Article ID 208760, 10 pages.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/208760

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.