Comparison of the Bioleaching Effect of Mesophilic (35°C) and Thermophilic (45°C) Bacteria on the TIZAPA Tailings


Article Preview

The exploitation of mineral deposits generates large amounts of wastes such as fine size particles, known as tailings. Mine wastes are characterized by the presence of pyrite, pyrrotite, galene, sphalerite, chalcopyrite and arsenopyrite. One of the most important environmental problems derived from the treatment and disposition of mining tailings is acid mine drainage (AMD) which results from the oxidation of the sulfurous minerals contained in these tailings. The acid generated is produced by a series of complex chemical reactions; the production rate is controlled by leaching microorganisms, which are present mining processes. In this work the bioleaching kinetics of heavy metals such as Cu, Fe, Zn, Cd, Pb, Ni and As, from a Tizapa tailing sample in presence of mesophilic and moderately thermophilic bacteria were studied and compared. The microorganisms used in this work were previously adapted to the tailing sample by the conventional method of successive steps. The percentage of dissolution of heavy metals at 45°C was smaller than at 35°C and the value of parameters such as redox potential and bacterial growth increased with temperature. Bioleaching studies were compared with the corresponding control systems.



Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 20-21)

Edited by:

Axel Schippers, Wolfgang Sand, Franz Glombitza and Sabine Willscher




R.E. Rivera-Santillán and V. Becerril-Reyes, "Comparison of the Bioleaching Effect of Mesophilic (35°C) and Thermophilic (45°C) Bacteria on the TIZAPA Tailings", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 20-21, pp. 34-37, 2007

Online since:

July 2007




[1] M. E Gutiérrez-Ruiz, M. M. Turrent. Los residuos de la minería mexicana. Instituto Nacional de Ecología. Information on http: /www. ine. gob. mx.

[2] D.W. Blowes, J.L. Jambor. The pore-water geochemistry and the mineralogy of the vadose zone of sulfide tailings, Waite Amulet, Quebec, Canada, Applied Geochemistry, Vol. 5 (1990). p.327346.


[3] N. F. Gray. Enviromental impact and remediation of acid mine drainage: a management problem. Enviromental Geology, Vol 35 (1/2) (1997). P. 62-71.

[4] K. Blight, D. E. Ralph, S. Thurgate. . Pyrite surfaces after bioleaching a mechanism for biooxidation. Hydrometallurgy Vol. 58, (2000). P. 227-237.


[5] S. R., Jennings, D. J. Dollhops, W. P. Inskep. . Acid production from sulfide minerals using hydrogen peroxide weathering. Applied Geochemistry Vol. 15 (2000). pp.235-243.


[6] M. Boon, H. J. Brasser, G. S. Hansford, J. J. Heijnen. Comparison of the oxidation kinetics of different pyrites in the presence of thiobacillus ferrooxidans or leptospirillum ferrooxidans. Hydrometallurgy Vol. 53 (1999). pp.57-72.


[7] M. Sadiq. Arsenic Chemistry in soils: an overview of thermodynamic predictions and field observations, Water, Air and Soil Pollution. Vol. 93 (1995). P. 117-136.


[8] H. Devecia, A. Akcilb, I. Alpa. Bioleaching of complex zinc sulphides using mesophilic and thermophilic bacteria: comparative importance of pH and iron. Hydrometallurgy Vol. 73 (2004).


Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.