Pyrite Surface Alteration of Synthetic Single Crystals as Effect of Microbial Activity and Crystallographic Orientation

Abstract:

Article Preview

To enhance our understanding of effects of microbially mediated pyrite dissolution and the influence parameters such as varied metabolism and crystallographic orientation of pyrite surfaces some dissolution experiments were performed. Microbial etching experiments on pyrite surfaces of different orientation, including {111} and {210} were devised. The experiments were performed using two strains of thermophilic Archaea (Sulfolobus metallicus, Metallosphaera sedula). Epifluorescence microscopy observations showed that the strains attach to the mineral surface. Studies with Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) showed cell attachment and etching effects after one week of incubation. Surface alteration produced structures following crystallographic orientation up to several 10 μm in size. For all incubated pyrite samples it became apparent that surface alteration was more pronounced with M. sedula than with S. metallicus.

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 20-21)

Edited by:

Axel Schippers, Wolfgang Sand, Franz Glombitza and Sabine Willscher

Pages:

350-353

Citation:

K. Etzel et al., "Pyrite Surface Alteration of Synthetic Single Crystals as Effect of Microbial Activity and Crystallographic Orientation", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 20-21, pp. 350-353, 2007

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] D. Vaughan and J. Craig: Mineral chemistry of metal sulfides (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1978).

[2] P. Singer and W. Stumm: Science Vol. 167 (1970), p.1121.

[3] H. Tributsch and J. Bennett: J. Chem. Tech. Biotech. Vol. 31 (1981), p.627.

[4] F. Crundwell: Hydrometallurgy Vol. 21 (1988), p.155.

[5] G. Rossi: FUEL Vol. 72 (1993), p.1581.

[6] W. Sand, T. Gehrke, P.G. Jozsa and A. Schippers: Hydrometallurgy Vol. 59 (2001), p.159.

[7] A. Schippers, in: Biogeochemistry of metal sulphide oxidation in mining environments, sediments, and soils, edited by J.P. Amend, K.J. Edwards and T.W. Lyons. T.W., Sulfur biogeochemistry - Past and present, p.49, Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America Special Paper (2004).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/0-8137-2379-5.49

[8] L. Keller, L.E. Murr: Biotechnol. Bioeng. Vol. 24 (1982), p.83.

[9] C. Moses, D. Nordstrom, J. Herman and A. Mills: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta Vol. 51 (1987), p.1561.

[10] G. Luther III: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta Vol. 51 (1987), p.3193.

[11] G. Luther III, in: Aquatic Chemical Kinetics, edited by W. Stumm, The frontier-molecularorbital theory approach in goetechnical processes, p.173, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1990).

[12] H. Tributsch: Hydrometallurgy Vol. 59 (2001), p.177.

[13] P. Norris and D. Barr, in: Bacterial oxidation of pyrite in high temperature reactors, edited by P.R. Norris and D.P. Kelly, Biohydrometallurgy: Proceedings of ISB, p.532, Science and Tech. Letters, Kew Surrey, England (1988).

[14] L. Larsson, G. Olsson, O. Holst and H. Karlsson: Biotechnol. Letters Vol. 15 (1993), p.99.

[15] M.B. Allen: Arch. Microbiol., Vol 32 (1959), p.270.

[16] T.D. Brock, K.M. Brock, R.T. Belly and R.L. Weiss: Arch. Microbiol. Vol. 84 (1972), p.56.

[17] H. Huber, G. Huber, K.O. Stetter: System. Appl. Microbiol. Vol. 6 (1985), p.105.

[18] K. Edwards, B. Goebel, T. Rodgers, M. Schrenk, T. Gihring, M. Cardona, B. Hu, M. McGuire, R. Hamers, N. Pace and J. Banlield: Geomicrobiol. J. Vol. 16 (1999), p.155.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.