Assessment of Government Contractor Classification System in Saudi Arabia


Article Preview

This paper presents results of a study to assess the Government Contractor Classification System in Saudi Arabia. Contract award procedures in public projects of Saudi Arabia are accomplished in two steps. The first one involves qualifying contractors to insure that their technical, financial, and managerial capabilities are suitable for the project to be awarded. This qualification is accomplished by the Contractor Classification Agency- Ministry of Municipal and Rural Affairs- in which the contractor is classified according to his specialty and capabilities. In the second step, bids of the contractors who satisfy the required classification are evaluated to select the best bid. Since the contractor classification is the only screening method to disqualify incompetent contractors and the difficulty of dismissing a qualified contractor who submits the lowest bid, the contractor classification must be an actual measure for the contractor's capabilities. To assess the contractor classification system a questionnaire has been prepared and distributed to the project mangers in different public ministries and agencies. The number of distributed questionnaire was 250 and 198 were collected and used in this study. In order to conduct an objective evaluation, a comparison has been conducted between performance of contractors who are awarded projects based on the contractor classification only with performance of contractors who are awarded projects based on the contractor classification and an additional prequalification by the project owner. Also, Chi-squared test was used to verify the cause of the difference in results of using these two types of prequalification. Results of the study reveal that the contractor classification system does not properly reflect the contractors’ capabilities.



Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 250-253)

Edited by:

Guangfan Li, Yong Huang and Chaohe Chen






A. M. Alsugair and M. M. Abuthnain, "Assessment of Government Contractor Classification System in Saudi Arabia", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 250-253, pp. 345-355, 2011

Online since:

May 2011




[1] Edyta Plebankiewicz, Construction Contractor Prequalification From Polish Clients' Perspective, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 16(1), (2010), p.57–64.

DOI: 10.3846/jcem.2010.05

[2] K. H. AL-Gobali Factors Considered in Contractor Prequalification Process in Saudi Arabia, Master Thesis Presented to King Fahad University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Saudi Arabia, (1994).

DOI: 10.2514/3.12262

[3] Abdullah M. Alsugair, Framework for Evaluating Bids of Construction Contractors, J. Management in Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 15 No. 2, March/April, (1999), PP. 72-78.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(1999)15:2(72)

[4] Jeffery Russell, Constructor Prequalification: choosing the best constructor and avoiding constructor failure,. ASCE, Reston, Va., USA, (1996).

[5] M. A. AL-Alwai, Contractor Pre-qualification: A computerized Model for Public Projects in Bahrain, Master Thesis presented to King Fahad University of Petroleum and Minerals (KFUPM), Saudi Arabia, (1991).

[6] Z. Hatush and M. Skitmore, Criteria for contractor selection, J. Construction Management and Economics 15 (2), (1997), pp.19-38.

DOI: 10.1080/014461997373088

[7] Z. Hatush and M. Skitmore, Evaluating contractor prequalification data: selection criteria and project success factors, J. Construction Management and Economics 15 (2), (1997), p.129–147.

DOI: 10.1080/01446199700000002

[8] Abdulaziz Bubshait and Khalid Alqnayan, Evaluating and Developing Procedures of Public Work Contract in Saudi Arabia, Institute of public Administration, Vol. 81, (1994), pp.49-78, (in Arabic language).

[9] Contractor Classification Agency, Saudi Arabia Ministry of Municipality and Rural Areas (2008), Retrieved from: http: /contractors. momra. gov. sa.

[10] Abdullah M. Alsugair, Impact of Mandatory Medical Insurance on Construction contractor in Saudi Arabia, Advanced Materials Research Vols. 163 – 167, (2011), pp.4529-4534.

DOI: 10.4028/

[11] A. Shash, and N Abdul-Hadi, Factors affecting a contractor mark-up size decision in Saudi Arabia, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 10, (1992), pp.415-429.

DOI: 10.1080/01446199200000039

[12] A. Shash, Factors considered in tendering decisions by top UK contractors, Construction Management and economics, Vol. 11, (1993), pp.111-118.

DOI: 10.1080/01446199300000004

[13] Hegazy, T., and Moselhi, O. Elements of cost estimating: a survey in Canada and the United States, , Cost Engineering, Vol. 37(5), (1995), pp.27-33.

[14] Mansour M. AbuAthneen, Evaluating and Improving the Construction Contract Award Methods for Public Sector in Saudi Arabia, MS Theses, CE Dept., King Saud University, (2001).

[15] Richard Lowry, Concepts and Applications of Inferential Statistics, «VassarStats: Web Site for Statistical Computation». (2011), http: /faculty. vassar. edu/lowry/webtext. html.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.