Climate Change Mitigation from Pyrolysis

Abstract:

Article Preview

In the report 2001 by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projects that climate could warm by as much as 10º F over the next 100 years and we already observed a warming of about 1º F since 1900. Therefore, how to mitigate the greenhouse gas effect is a very important issue since it affects everyone alive and not born. This paper mainly discusses the impacts of greenhouse gas emission that affects people the most. This paper mainly discusses the following questions: 1) what factors lead to the greenhouse gas effect? 2) How can pyrolysis become a potential source to mitigate the greenhouse gas effect and what are the choices we may have? Pyrolysis, as another bioenergy alternative, helps climate change mitigation while it also produces biochar that fixes carbon as a more stable form that has additional value when applied in agricultural land. GHGs come from the use of fossil fuel (CO2), nitrogen fertilizer application (N2O), and livestock enteric fermentation (NH4) and we need to find some strategies to reduce the emissions of GHGs such as crop fertilization alteration, crop tillage alteration, livestock management, manure management and biofuel production. Since CO2 play the most important role in the GHG effects, the goal of this paper is to find the alternative energy to help mitigate the GHG effects by reducing the amount of CO2 emissions. The forest can be a candidate because it has the function of carbon sink and is able to produce energy biomass. Forests really do a good job that reduce the amount of CO2 in the air, however, since the carbon value and interest rate will affect the optimal rotation length, it becomes uncertain whether or not the forest will be able to provide a stable input for energy production.

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 347-353)

Edited by:

Weiguo Pan, Jianxing Ren and Yongguang Li

Pages:

2630-2634

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.347-353.2630

Citation:

C. C. Kung "Climate Change Mitigation from Pyrolysis", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 347-353, pp. 2630-2634, 2012

Online since:

October 2011

Authors:

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] Demirbas A. Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning And Policy 1 (1) (2006), pp.75-84.

[2] Hsien H. Khoo and Reginald B. H. Tan. Environmental Impact Evaluation of Conventional Fossil Fuel Production (Oil and Natural Gas) and Enhanced Resource Recovery with Potential CO2 Sequestration. Energy Fuels, 20 (5) (2006), 1914 -(1924).

DOI: 10.1021/ef060075+

[3] McDonald, S., Thierfelder, K. Deriving a global social accounting matrix from GTAP version 5 data. Global Trade Analysis Project, GTAP Technical Paper, vol. 23. Purdue University (2004).

[4] McCarl, Bruce A. Agriculture in the climate change and energy price squeeze. Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX (2006).

[5] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. p.752 . (2001).

[6] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 – 2002. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. (2005).

[7] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emission sand Sinks, 1990–1997. Washington DC: EPA-236-R-99-003 (1999a).

[8] U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. U.S. Methane Emissions 1990-2020: Inventories, Projections, and Opportunities for Reductions. Washington DC: EPA 430-R-99-013 (1999b).

[9] Rosenberg, N. J., R. C. Izaurralde and E. L. Malone, eds. Carbon Sequestration in Soils: Science, Monitoring, and Beyond. Proceedings of the St. Michaelis Workshop, Batelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory (1999).

[10] Marland, G., B. A. McCarl and U. A. Schneider. Soil Carbon: Policy and Economics, Climatic Change 51(1) (2001), 101–117.

[11] Sedjo, R. A. Forests, A Tool to Moderate Global Warming?, Environment 13(1) (2000), p.14.

[12] McCarl, B. A. Carbon Sequestration via Tree Planting on Agricultural Lands: An Economic Study of Costs and Policy Design Alternatives, Paper presented at the Energy Modeling Forum (1998).

[13] Lal, R., J.M. Kimble, R. F. Follett and C. V. Cole. The Potential of U.S. Cropland to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect, 128 pp. Chelsea MI: Sleeping Bear Press Inc (1997).

[14] Blottnitz, H; Rabl, A; Boiadjiev, D; Taylor, T; Arnold, S. Damage Costs of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Europe and Their Internalization ,. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, vol. 49, no. 3 (2006), pp.413-33.

DOI: 10.1080/09640560600601587

[15] Schneider, Uwe A; McCarl, Bruce A . Economic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels for Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation,. Environmental and Resource Economics, vol. 24, no. 4 (2003), pp.291-312.

[16] Lehmann, J., J. P. Silva, C. Steiner, T. Nehls, W. Zech, and B. Glaser. Nutrient Availability and Leaching in an Archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon Basin: Fertilizer, Manure and Charcoal Amendments. Plant and Soil 249 (2003).

[17] Chan, K. Y., L. Zwieten, I. Meszaros, A. Downie, and S. Joseph. Agronomic Values of Green Waste Biochar as a Soil Amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45 (2007) 629-634.

DOI: 10.1071/sr07109

[18] Bridgwater, T. Fast Pyrolysis Based Biorefineries. Chemistry 4 (2005), pp.15-37.

[19] Wright, M. M., R. C. Brown, and A. A. Boateng. Distributed Processing of Biomass to Biooil for Subsequent Production of Fischer-Tropsch Liquids. Biofuels, Bioprocessing, and Biorefining 2(2008) 229-238.

DOI: 10.1002/bbb.73

[20] Ringer, M., V. Putsche, and J. Scahill. Large-Scale Pyrolysis Oil Production: A Technology Assessment and Economic Analysis. Environmental Science 17 (2006), pp.21-33.

DOI: 10.2172/894989

[21] Czernik, S., and A. V. Bridgwater. Overview of Applications of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oil. Energy and Fuels 18(2004), pp.590-598.

DOI: 10.1021/ef034067u

In order to see related information, you need to Login.