Blackboard as a Tool for Peer Learning and Interaction for Engineering Students

Abstract:

Article Preview

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the learning experiences of mechanical engineering students who used Blackboard technology at the University of Botswana. The results presented are based on the application of the technology in two courses offered to Year 3 students. As the results of this study were encouraging it is recommended that more courses in the mechanical engineering programme should migrate to blended mode of instruction delivery.

Info:

Periodical:

Edited by:

Prof. A.O. Akii Ibhadode

Pages:

591-599

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.367.591

Citation:

J. Uziak and M.T. Oladiran, "Blackboard as a Tool for Peer Learning and Interaction for Engineering Students", Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 367, pp. 591-599, 2012

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] H. Block: The e-Bang Theory: Education Industry Overview. Illuminismo , 2, (1999).

[2] J. Bourne, D. Harris, and F. Mayadas: Online Engineering Education: Learning Anywhere, Anytime. Journal of Engineering Education , 94(1), 2005, 131-146.

DOI: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00834.x

[3] P. Ewell: Higher Education and Corporate/business join forces to plan and develop distance learning communities: the beginning stages of planning, preparing, design, and development. In R. Ferdig, & e. al. (Ed. ), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, 2004, 428-432.

[4] I. E. Allen and J. Seaman: Sizing the Opportunity: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States. Wellesley, MA: The Sloan Consortium, (2003).

[5] WebCT. (2008). Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http: /www. webct. com.

[6] Blackboard. (2010). Retrieved February 14, 2010, from http: /www. blackboard. com/Teaching-Learning/Overview. aspx.

[7] Questionmark … getting results. (2009). Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http: /www. questionmark. com.

[8] i~assess. (2009). Retrieved January 15, 2009, from http: /www. iassess. com.

[9] S. Britain and O. Liber: A Framework for Pedagogical Evaluation of Virtual Learning Environments. JISC Report (1998).

[10] J. Bruce and N. Curson: UEA Virtual Learning Environment – Product evaluation report. Learning Technology Group, University of East Anglia (2001).

[11] N. Entwistle: Approaches to learning and perceptions of learning environment. Higher Education, 22, 1991, 201-204.

[12] T. Garcia: The role of motivational strategies in self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 65, 1995, 29-42.

DOI: 10.1002/tl.37219956306

[13] R. P. Pintrich: Understanding self-regulated learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 1995. 3-12.

[14] A. Armani: The integrated learning model: A design experiment in Web-based instruction. Best Practice in Teaching with Technology. Montreal, Canada: Concordia University, (2000).

[15] A. Parker: Interaction in distance education: The critical conversation. Educational Technology Review, 12, 1999, 13-17.

[16] M. Driscoll: Ten things we know about teaching on-line. Technology for Learning Newsletter, 1, 2000, 1-5.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.