Cradle-to-Gate Analysis of Materials Used in Historic and Modern Housing in China

Abstract:

Article Preview

Climate change and energy efficiency are some of the most pressing issues facing China today. With its economic growth since the economic reforms in 1978 the government has struggled to contain environmental damage and social strife related to the economy’s rapid transformation. With the rapid growth in population and urbanization the demand for housings escalated and thus existing houses are under threat of being demolished to make way for new construction. However there was a strong debate that existing houses should be maintained and upgraded instead of demolishing for new development as improvements to energy and water efficiency of existing homes can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and decrease utility bills. This paper aims at reviewing the importance of existing houses and their environmental significance in conservation as opposed to demolition. This paper presents and discusses the preliminary results for the first two stages of a research project undertaken at the University of Technology Sydney to investigate environmental performance of historic housings in Xiao He Zhi Jie in Hangzhou, China.

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 374-377)

Edited by:

Hui Li, Yan Feng Liu, Ming Guo, Rui Zhang and Jing Du

Pages:

2029-2036

Citation:

G. K. C. Ding et al., "Cradle-to-Gate Analysis of Materials Used in Historic and Modern Housing in China", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 374-377, pp. 2029-2036, 2012

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] R.J. Cole: Building Research and Information Vol. 27 (1999), No. 4/5, p.230–246.

[2] S. Balderstone: Built heritage: A major contributor to environmental, social and economic sustainability (2004) (http: /www. heritage. vic. gov. au/admin/).

[3] Centre for International Economics: Capitalising on the building sector's potential to lessen the costs of a broad based GHG emission cut (Centre for International Economics, Canberra 2007).

[4] P.A. Bullen: Facilities Vol. 25 (2007), No. 1/2, pp.20-31.

[5] A. Power: Energy Policy Vol. 36 (2008), pp.4487-4501.

[6] N. Kohler: Building Research and Information Vol. 27 (1999), No. 4/5, pp.309-320.

[7] G. De Valencve: The construction sector system approach (CIB Publication No 293 2004).

[8] D. Ireland: New tricks with old bricks (The Empty Homes Agency, London 2008).

[9] B. Boardman, S. Darby, G. Killip, M. Hinnells, C.N. Jardine, J. Palmer & G. Sinden: 40% House (Environmental Change Institute, Oxford 2005).

[10] R.D.F. Bromley, A.R. Tallon, & C.J. Thomas: Urban Studies Vol. 42, 2005, No. 13, pp.2407-29.

[11] A. Mickaityte, E. Zavadskas, A. Kaklauskas, & L. Tupenaite: International Journal of Strategic Property Management Vol. 12 2008, pp.53-68.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3846/1648-715x.2008.12.53-68

[12] R. Moe: Preservation's essential role in fighting climate change (http: /www. preservationnation. org/sustainabe. stewardship 2007).

[13] SDC: Stock take: Delivering improvements in existing housing (Sustainable Development Commission, London 2006).

[14] Cabinet Office: Resource productivity-Making more with less(Performance and Innovation Unit, Cabinet Office, London 2000).

[15] T.Y. Chen, J. Burnett, & C.K. Chau: Energy Vol. 26 2001, Issue 4, pp.323-340.

[16] D.G. Fridley, N.T. Aden, & N. Zhou: China's building energy use (Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA 2007).

[17] D.J. Gu, Y.X. Zhu, & L.J. Gu: Journal of Tsinghua University Vol. 46 2006, No. 12, p.1953-(1956).

[18] G.P. Hammond, & C.I. Jones: Inventory of carbon and energy, Version 2, (Sustainable Energy Research Team, University of Bath, UK 2011).

[19] G.K.C. Ding: in Proceedings of ARCOM, 23rd Annual Conference and Annual General Meeting, University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, 3-5 September, pp.851-860, (2007).

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.