Comparison of Expert and Novice Eye Movement Behaviors during Landing Flight


Article Preview

Objective To study expert and novice eye movement pattern during simulated landing flight for providing references to evaluate flight performance and training of pilots. Methods The subjects were divided in to two group s of expert and novice according to their flight simulation experience. Eye movement data were recorded when they were performing landing task. Comparison of expert and novice flight performance data and eye movement data was made. Results It was found that the differences between expert and novice lay not only in flight performance but also in eye movement pattern. Performance of expert was better than novice. Expert had shorter fixation time, more fixation points, faster scan velocity, greater scan frequency and wider scan area than novice. It was also found that eye movement pattern of expert bring lower mental workload than novice. Conclusion Flight performance is related to eye movement pattern. Effective eye movement pattern is related to good flight performance. The analysis of eye movement indices can evaluate pilots’ flight performance and provide reference for flight training.



Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 383-390)

Edited by:

Wu Fan






W. Liu et al., "Comparison of Expert and Novice Eye Movement Behaviors during Landing Flight", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 383-390, pp. 2556-2560, 2012

Online since:

November 2011




[1] BellenkesAH, Wickens CD, Kramer AF. Visual scanning and pilot expertise: their role of attentional flexibility and mentalmodel development [ J ]. Aviation Space and EnvironmentalMedicine, 1997, 68 (7) : 5692579.

[2] Kasarskis P, Stehwien J, Hickox J, et al. Comparison of expert and novice scan behaviors during VFR flight [ EB ]. http: / /www. aviation. uiuc. edu /UnitsHFD / conference /proced01. pdf. 20011.

[3] Sajay S, Joel S, Greenstein, AK, et al. Use of eye movements as feedforward training for a synthetic aircraft inspection task[ J ]. Eyes on Interaction, 2005, 4 (2) : 1402149.

DOI: 10.1145/1054972.1054993

[4] Wetzel PA, Anderson K, GretchenM, et al. Instructor use of eye position based feedback for p ilot training [ J ]. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1998, 2 (5) : 529.

[5] L IU Zhongqi, YUAN Xiugan, L IUWei, et al. Characteristics of eyemovement and cognition analysis by simulating the landing course of aircraft [ J ]. Space Medicine &Medical Engineering, 2002, 15 (5) : 3792380.

[6] Henry L, TaylorDA, Talleur TW, et al. Incremental Training Effectiveness of Personal Computers Used for Instrument Training: Basic Instruments[ R ]. 2002, 2: ARL20224 /NASA0222.

[7] OttatiWL, Richter J. Eye scan patterns of experienced and novice p ilots during visual flight rules (VFR) navigation[ C ]. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43 rd AnnualMeeting, Minneapolis, MN, 1999: 66270.

DOI: 10.1177/154193129904300114

[8] DING Bangxin. Science of Aircraft Piloting [M ]. Beijing: Blue Sky Press, 2004: 56.

[9] Mourant RR, Rockwell TH. Strategies of visual search by novice and experienced drivers [ J ]. Human Factors, 1972, 14(4) , 3252335.

DOI: 10.1177/001872087201400405

[10] Ahern S, Beatty J. Pup illary responses during informationp rocessing vary with scholastic aptitude test scores [ J ]. Science, 1979, 205 (4412) : 128921292.

DOI: 10.1126/science.472746

[11] Shap iro KL, Raymond JE. Training of efficiency oculomotor strategies enhances skill acquisition [ J ]. Acta Psychologica, 1989, 71 (123) , 2172242.

DOI: 10.1016/0001-6918(89)90010-3

In order to see related information, you need to Login.