Adaptive Sample Reduction Techniques for Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategy in Multi Channel Cochlear Implant

Abstract:

Article Preview

CIS (Continuous Interleaved Sampling) strategy in which electrodes stimulus is determined based on extracted information from amplitude of different bands of input signal, is a basis in processing methods in cochlear implant systems. In this paper besides implementing this strategy, methods for improving sample reduction and computational efficiency are also presented. In this case adaptive method according to processing parameters and an input signal has been suggested that due to the use of fewer samples to synthesize the signal is better than the other methods and is significantly efficient.

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 403-408)

Edited by:

Li Yuan

Pages:

2021-2026

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.403-408.2021

Citation:

S. Tabibi and H. Sadjedi, "Adaptive Sample Reduction Techniques for Continuous Interleaved Sampling Strategy in Multi Channel Cochlear Implant", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 403-408, pp. 2021-2026, 2012

Online since:

November 2011

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] P.C. Loizou, Introduction to cochlear implants, IEEE Eng. Med Biol. Mag. 18 (1), pp.32-42, (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/51.740962

[2] F. -G. Zeng, Trends in cochlear implants, Trends Amplif. 8, pp.1-34, (2004).

[3] F. Chen, Y. -T. Zhang, A novel temporal fine structure-based speech synthesis model for cochlear implant, Elsevier Signal Proc. 88, pp.2693-2699, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2008.05.011

[4] P.C. Loizou, Mimicking the human ear, IEEE Signal Proc. Mag., pp.101-130, September (1998).

[5] B.S. Wilson, C. C Finley, D.T. Lawson, R.D. Wolford, D.K. Eddington, W.M. Rabinowitz, Better speech recognition with cochlear implants, Nature 352 (6332), pp.236-238, July (1991).

DOI: 10.1038/352236a0

[6] B.S. Wilson, M.F. Dorman, Cochlear implants: a remarkable past and a brilliant future, Elsevier Hear. Res. 242, pp.3-21, (2008).

[7] L.T. Cohen, L.M. Richardson, E. Saunders, R.S.C. Cowan, Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking, Elsevier Hear. Res. 179, pp.72-87, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00096-0

[8] A. v. Wieringen, R.P. Carlyon, J. Laneau, J. Wouters, Effects of waveform shape on human sensitivity to electrical stimulation of the inner ear, Elsevier Hear. Res. 200, pp.73-86, (2005).

DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.08.006

[9] D.K. Eddington, C. Boex-Spano, J. Tierney, V. Noel, M. Whearty, Speech processors for auditory prostheses, Seventh quarterly progress report. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Research Laboratory of Electronics, Cambridge, (1997).

[10] C.S. Throckmorton, M.S. Kucukoglu, J.J. Remus, L.M. Collins, Acoustic model investigation of a multiple carrier frequency algorithm for encoding fine frequency structure: Implications for cochlear implants, Elsevier Hear. Res. 218, pp.30-42, (2006).

DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2006.03.020

[11] K. Fishman, R.V. Shannon, W.H. Slattery, Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor, J. Speech Hear. Res. 40 (5), pp.1201-1215, October (1997).

DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4005.1201

[12] L. Friesen, R.V. Shannon, D. Baskent, X.S. Wang, Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implant, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110 (2), pp.1150-1163, (2002).

DOI: 10.1121/1.1381538

[13] F. Zheng, G. Zhang, Z. Song, Comparison of different implementation of MFCC, J. Comp. Sci. Tech., 16(6), pp.582-589, September (2001).

[14] K. Nie, G. Stickney, F. -G. Zeng, Encoding frequency modulation to improve cochlear implant performance in noise, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 52, no. 1, pp.64-73, January (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2004.839799

[15] F. -G. Zeng, K. Nie, G.S. Stickney, Y. -Y. Kong, M. Vongphoe, A. Bhargave, C. Wei, K. Cao, Speech recognition with amplitude and frequency modulations, PNAS (Proceedings of the National academy of Science of the United States of America), vol. 102, no. 7, pp.2293-2298, February (2005).

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0406460102

[16] R.A. Fearn, Music and pitch perception of cochlear implant recipients,. A thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of New South Wales, December (2001).

[17] C. -H. Chang, G.T. Anderson, P.C. Loizou, A neural network model for optimizing vowel recognition by cochlear implant listeners, IEEE Trans. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Eng., vol. 9, pp.42-48, August (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/7333.918275

[18] J.H. Won, S.M. Schimmel, W.R. Drennan, P.E. Souza, L. Atlas, J.T. Rubinstein, Improving performance in noise for hearing aids and cochlear implants using coherent modulation filtering, Elsevier Hear. Res. 239, pp.1-11, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.01.009

In order to see related information, you need to Login.