Lampposts as Landmarks for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping


Article Preview

This paper investigates the effectiveness of using lampposts, which are commonly found in University campus environments with high frequency, as landmarks in a 2D LIDAR based Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) framework. Lampposts offer a number of benefits compared to other forms of landmarks. Their unique spatial signature makes it possible to design effective algorithms to extract them. They have a very small spatial size. Their use removes the challenge of determining a corresponding location between difference views. This represents a major challenge if larger objects are used as landmarks. The proposed SLAM algorithm contains three stages. Firstly LIDAR segmentation is performed. Next each object is input to a binary classifier which determines objects with a high probability of corresponding to lampposts. Finally these extracted lampposts are input to an Iterative Closest Point (ICP) based SLAM algorithm. The ICP algorithm used is an extension of the traditional ICP algorithm and filters associations due to noise. Results achieved by the proposed system were very positive. An accurate map of a university’s lampposts was created and localization, when compared to GPS ground-truth, was very accurate.



Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 403-408)

Edited by:

Li Yuan




M. Jilani et al., "Lampposts as Landmarks for Simultaneous Localization and Mapping", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 403-408, pp. 823-829, 2012

Online since:

November 2011





[1] H. Durrant-Whyte and T. Bailey, Simultaneous localisation and mapping(slam): Part i the essential algorithms, IEEE Robotics and Automation Magazine, vol. 2, p.2006, (2006).


[2] R. Smith, M. Self, and P. Cheeseman, Estimating uncertain spatial relationships in robotics, in Robotics and Automation. Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on, vol. 4, Mar. 1987, p.850– 850.


[3] S. Diamantas and R. Crowder, Localisation and mapping using a laser range finder: A goal-seeking approach, " in Autonomic and Autonomous Systems, 2009. ICAS , 09. Fifth International Conference on, 2009, p.270 –276.


[4] F. Amigoni, S. Gasparini, and M. Gini, Building segment-based maps without pose information, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, no. 7, p.1340 –1359, (2006).


[5] C. -C. Wang and C. Thorpe, Simultaneous localization and mapping with detection and tracking of moving objects, vol. 3, 2002, p.2918–2924.

[6] J. Leonard and H. Durrant-Whyte, Simultaneous map building and localization for an autonomous mobile robot, " in Intelligent Robots and Systems '91. 'Intelligence for Mechanical Systems, Proceedings IROS , 91. IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on, vol. 3, Nov 1991, p.1442.


[7] M. S. Darms, P. E. Rybski, C. Baker, and C. Urmson, Obstacle detection and tracking for the urban challenge, Trans. Intell. Transport. Sys., vol. 10, no. 3, p.475–485, (2009).


[8] H. Zhao, M. Chiba, R. Shibasaki, X. Shao, J. Cui, and H. Zha, A laserscanner- based approach toward driving safety and traffic data collection, Trans. Intell. Transport. Sys., vol. 10, no. 3, p.534–546, (2009).


[9] Y. Li and E. Olson, Extracting general-purpose features from lidar data, in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2010 IEEE International Conference on, 2010, p.1388 –1393.


[10] S. Wu, S. Decker, P. Chang, T. Camus, and J. Eledath, Collision sensing by stereo vision and radar sensor fusion, in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2008 IEEE, 2008, p.404 –409.


[11] J. P. Hwang, S. E. Cho, K. J. Ryu, S. Park, and E. Kim, Multi-classifier based lidar and camera fusion, in IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference, 30 2007-Oct. 3 2007, p.467–472.


[12] D. Rodriguez-Losada and J. Minguez, Improved data association for icp-based scan matching in noisy and dynamic environments, in Robotics and Automation, 2007 IEEE International Conference on, April 2007, p.3161 –3166.