Numerical Analysis of Concrete Arch Bridge on the Situation of Seismic Damage


Article Preview

Based on the example, red-Flag Bridge in Chongzhou City, using the finite element to analyze the response spectrum of seismic performance for the concrete arch bridge under two conditions. Through the numerical analysis of vibrational damage on the whole bridge, reveals the nether structure and elements of bridge is affected by the seismic waves under the seismic effect and the great stiffness in upper structure, and posts that the anti-inertia in longitudinal direction is more powerful than the transverse and vertical ones. The deformation of arch ring is mostly affected by the displacement on transverse line, DY direction, and less in the longitudinal, vertical and rotational direction. According to the analysis of spectrum value displacement on abutment, finds out that the transverse direction of abutment is mostly affected by the displacement on DZ direction, for the abutment displacement, less in the middle, big in both sides. And for the vertical one, it is mostly affected by DY displacement, in the DY displacement of abutment, big in top, less in base.



Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 446-449)

Edited by:

Xiuli Du, Jianjun Zheng, Weiming Yan, Yue Li and Jianwei Zhang






H. K. Chen et al., "Numerical Analysis of Concrete Arch Bridge on the Situation of Seismic Damage", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 446-449, pp. 2783-2790, 2012

Online since:

January 2012




[1] Nourredine Mezouer1, Kamel Silhadi and Hamid Afra. Importance of spatial variability of seismic ground motion effects on long beams response: Journal of Civil Engineering and Construction Technology Vol. 1(2010), pp.1-13.

[2] Collier C.J., and Elnashai, A. S. A procedure for combining vertical and horizontal seismic action effects: J. Earthquake Eng., Vol. 5(2001), p.521–539.

DOI: 10.1142/s136324690100056x

[3] Elgamal, A., and He, L. Vertical earthquake ground motion records: an overview: J. Earthquake Eng., Vol. 8(2004), p.663–697.

DOI: 10.1080/13632460409350505

[4] Zanardo G, Hao H, Modena C. Seismic response of multi-span simply supported bridges to a spatially varying earthquake ground motion: Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 34(2005), p.327–348.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.166

[5] Zhiqiang Wang and George C. Lee. A comparative study of bridge damage due to the Wenchuan, Northridge, Loma Prieta and San Fernando earthquakes: Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 8(2009), pp.251-261.

DOI: 10.1007/s11803-009-9063-y

[6] Fabio F. Taucer, Carlo Paulotto and Gustavo Ayala. Hollow bridge-pier properties for response spectrum analysis: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 8(2010), pp.1397-1420.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9189-3

[7] DONG Shengli , LI Xiaojun and QI Xingju. Study seismic semi-active control algorithms for simply supported beam bridge: Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Vol. 27(2007), pp.56-60.

[8] WANG Junwen, LI Jianzhong and FAN Lichu. Parametric study of longitudinal seismic pounding response for continuous girder bridges: China J ournal of H ighway and Transport, Vol. 28(2005), pp.42-27.

[9] N. Lantada,J. Irizarry A.H. Barbat, et al. A.H. Barbat,X. Goula,A. Roca. Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method: Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 8(2010), pp.201-229.

DOI: 10.1007/s10518-009-9148-z

[10] Alemdar Bayraktar, Temel Türker, Mehmet Akköse, Sevket. The effect of reservoir length on seismic performance of gravity dams to near and far-fault ground motions: Natural Hazards, Vol. 52(2010), pp.257-275.

DOI: 10.1007/s11069-009-9368-1

[11] H. Bachmann,P. Linde,T. Wenk. Capacity Design and Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Of Earthquake Resistant Structures: 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. (1995), pp.11-20.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.