A Conceptual Model to Assess the Buildability of Building Structure at Design Stage in Malaysia


Article Preview

Buildability is increasingly becoming a major requirement in building construction practice. The aim of buildability is to improve efficiency of the overall building process by developing construction sensitive designs. The objective of this study is to develop a model to assess the buildability of the buildings within Malaysian construction projects. To achieve the objective of this study, a structured interview with an expert panel, including 30 construction professionals, was conducted to compare the common buildability attributes with common construction systems for building structure in Malaysia using analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The proposed model to assess the buildability of the construction buildings was evaluated and the model was amended to fulfill the requirements of the construction industry in Malaysia. Results of this study are useful to evaluate the design of the buildings within Malaysian construction projects, thus saving time, cost, and enhancing quality.



Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 446-449)

Edited by:

Xiuli Du, Jianjun Zheng, Weiming Yan, Yue Li and Jianwei Zhang




M. Nourbakhsh et al., "A Conceptual Model to Assess the Buildability of Building Structure at Design Stage in Malaysia", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 446-449, pp. 3879-3884, 2012

Online since:

January 2012




[1] R. Navon, A. Shapira, and Y. Shechori, Automated Rebar Constructability Diagnosis. Construction Engineering Management. 126(5 ) (2000), p.389–397.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2000)126:5(389)

[2] L.O. Oyedele and K.W. Tham, Clients' assessment of architects' performance in building delivery process: Evidence from Nigeria. Building and Environment. 42(5) (2007), p.2090-(2099).

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.06.030

[3] Business_Roundtable, Integrating Construction Resources and Technology into Engineering. 1982, Report of a Construction Industry Cost Effectiveness Project.

[4] C. Gray, Buildability: the construction contribution. 1983, The Chartered Institute of Building.

[5] P.T.I. Lam, et al., A Model for Buildability Assessment in Hong Kong, in Research monograph. 2006, Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

[6] Building and Construction Authority (BCA) (2004) Code of practice on buildable design BCA, Singapore.

[7] R.M. Zin, L.J. Nesan, and A.H. Mohammed, Constructability assessment framework. Journal of Building and Construction Management. 9(1) (2004), pp.44-58.

[8] O.O. Ugwu, C.J. Anumba, and A. Thorpe, The development of cognitive models for constructability assessment in steel frame structures. Advances in Engineering Software. 35(3-4) (2004), pp.191-203.

DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2004.02.001

[9] Y.Q. Yang, S.Q. Wang, M. Dulaimi, and S.P. Low, A fuzzy quality function deployment system for buildable design decision-makings. Automation in Construction. 12(4) (2003), pp.381-93.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-5805(03)00002-5

[10] W.D. Yu and M.J. Skibniewski, Quantitative constructability analysis with a neuro-fuzzy knowledge-based multi-criterion decision support system. Automation in Construction. 8(5) (1999), pp.553-65.

DOI: 10.1016/s0926-5805(98)00105-8

[11] Z. Hassan, CONPLAN: construction planning and buildability evaluation in an integrated and intelligent construction environment, in TIME Research Institute, University of Salford. (1997).

[12] M.A. Nima, M.R. Abdul-Kadir, M.S. Jaafar, and R.G. Alghulami, Constructability implementation: a survey in the Malaysian construction industry. Construction Management and Economics. 19(8) (2001), pp.819-29.

DOI: 10.1080/01446190110089709

[13] M.Z. Rosli, Design Phase Constructability Assessment Model, in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. (2004).

[14] B. Trigunarsyah, Constructability Practices among Construction Contractors in Indonesia. Construction Engineering and Management. 130(5) (2004), pp.656-670.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2004)130:5(656)

[15] E. Saghatforoush, S. Hassim, M.S. Jaafar, and R.A.M. Kadir, Constructability implementation among Malaysian building contractors. European Journal of Scientific Research. 29(4) (2009), pp.518-532.

[16] A. Ishizaka and A. Labib, Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Choice: Benefits and Limitations. ORInsight. 22(4) (2009), p.201–220.

DOI: 10.1057/ori.2009.10

[17] H.M. Shaik, et al., Buildability Attributes at Design Phase in Malaysian Building Construction. International Journal of Sustainable Construction Engineering and Technology. 2(1) (2011), pp.24-43.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.