Modelling of Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis in a Fluidized Bed Reactor


Article Preview

The FT reaction involves the conversion of syngas which is derived from natural gas or coal to different kinds of products according to the operating conditions and the type of the catalyst. In other words, it is a practical way to convert solid fuel (coal) and natural gas to various hydrocarbons (C1-C60) and oxygenates such as alkanes, alkenes etc. The main products of the reaction are naphtha and gasoline. This paper deals with developing a proper product distribution model for FT process using the appropriate kinetic model, optimizing the respective rate constants while applying them in product distribution equations. The results revealed only 8.09% deviations from the olefin experimental data and 10.27% deviations from the paraffin experimental data being acceptable when compared with previous open literature data.



Edited by:

Junqiao Xiong




M. Kazemeini et al., "Modelling of Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis in a Fluidized Bed Reactor", Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 586, pp. 274-281, 2012

Online since:

November 2012




[1] A.P. Raje, B.H. Davis, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over iron-based catalysts in a slurry reactor. Reaction rates, selectivities and implications for improving hydrocarbon productivity, Catal. Today 36 (1997) 335-345.


[2] E. van Steen, H. Schulz, Polymerization kinetics of the Fischer-Tropsch CO hydrogenation using iron and cobalt based catalysts, Appl. Catal. A 186 (1999) 309-320.


[3] C. Maretto, R. Krishna, Modelling of bubble column slurry reactor for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, Catal. Today 52 (1999) 279-289.


[4] M.R. Rahimpour, S.M. Jokar, Z. Jamshidnejad, A novel slurry bubble column membrane reactor concept for Fischer-Tropsch synthesis in GTL technology, Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 90 (2012) 383-396.


[5] C. Knottenbelt, Mossgas gas-to-liquid, diesel fuels–an environmentally friendly option, Catal. Today 71 (2002) 437-445.


[6] A. Rafiee, M. Hillestad, Synthesis Gas Production Configurations for Gas-to-Liquid Applications, Chem. Eng. Technol. 35 (2012) 870-876.


[7] G.A. Huff Jr., C.N. Satterfield, Evidence for two chain growth probabilities on iron catalysts in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, J. Catal. 85 (1984) 370-379.


[8] R.J. Madon, W.F. Taylor, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on a precipitated iron catalyst, J. Catal. 69 (1981) 32-43.

[9] J. Patzlaff, Y. Liu, C. Graffmann, J. Gaube, Studies on product distribution of iron and cobalt catalyzed Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, Appl. Catal. A 86 (1999) 109-119.


[10] J. Patzlaff, Y. Liu, C. Graffmann, J. Gaube, Interpretation and kinetic modeling of product distributions of cobalt catalyzed Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, Catal. Today 71 (2002) 381-394.


[11] J. Chang, L. Bai, B-T. Teng, R. -L. Zhang, J. Yang, Y. -Y. Xu, H. -W. Xiang, Y. -W. Li, Kinetic modeling of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis over Fe-Cu-K-SiO2 Catalyst in slurry phase reactor, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62 (2007) 4983-4991.


[12] G.P. van der Laan, Kinetics, Selectivity and Scale Up of the Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis, Ph.D. thesis, University of Groningen (1999).

[13] D. Kunii, O. Levenspiel, Fluidization Engineering, Second ed., (1991).

[14] J.H. Han, G. Wild, S.D. Kim, Phase holdup characteristics in three phase fluidized beds, Chem. Eng. J. 43 (1990) 67-73.


[15] J.R. Fair, Designing Gas-Sparged Reactors, Chemical Engineering (1967) 67-74.

[16] F.A.N. Fernandes, Polymerization Kinetics of Fischer-Tropsch Reaction on Iron Based Catalysts and Product Grade Optimization, Chem. Eng. Technol. 28 (2005) 930-938.