Microstructures and Mechanical Characteristics of Enamel and Dentin of Primary and Permanent Teeth


Article Preview

Objective: To investigate the microstructures and mechanical characteristics of enamel and dentin of primary and permanent teeth by AFM, analyze their relationships and provide information for bionics and designs of dental materials. Methods: After embedding, cutting and grinding, 10 primary teeth and 10 permanent teeth were randomly divided into four groups. The morphology of samples was obtained by AFM and the roughness and Young’s modulus were calculated by JPK DP Data processing version 4.0 software. Results: In permanent teeth groups, the enamel rods arrange more tightly than those in primary teeth groups. The roughness of primary enamel (1203±39.5nm)was higher than permanent teeth(954.6±30.5nm).The Young′s modulus of enamel in primary teeth(80.4±7.7GPa)was lower than permanent teeth(90.8±2.2GPa). The roughness of dentin in primary teeth (1695±67.6nm)is higher than permanent teeth (1210±45.3nm)and the Young′s modulus of dentin in primary teeth(19.8±1.9 GPa)was lower than the permanent teeth (23.1±1.0 GPa). Conclusions: The mechanical characteristics of primary and permanent teeth are closely related to their microstructures.



Edited by:

Guohui Yang




Q. Z. Si et al., "Microstructures and Mechanical Characteristics of Enamel and Dentin of Primary and Permanent Teeth", Advanced Materials Research, Vol. 658, pp. 67-72, 2013

Online since:

January 2013




[1] Yao Liyun, Mao Jing, Zhang Jing Tao, Liu Yan, Zhou Bin. AFM nanoindentation of morphology and roughness of dentin surface after different surface treatment [J]. Journal of Modern Stomatology, 2008, 22(3): 289-291.

[2] Peng Bin, dental restoration [M]. Wuhan: Science and Technology Press. 2003: 17-20.

[3] Charles R. Parkinson, Atif Shahzad, Gareth D. Rees. Initial stages of enamel erosion: An in situ atomic force microscopy study [J]. Journal of Structural Biology, 2010; 171: 298-302.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsb.2010.04.011

[4] Sevinc Karana, Beyza Hancioglu Kircelli, Bahar Tasdelen. Enamel surface roughness after debonding [J]. Angle Orthodontist, 2010; 80: 1081-1088.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2319/012610-55.1

[5] Relationship between the microstructure and nanohardness of dentin and enamel of human teeth [J]. Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 2008, 43(8): 500-501.

[6] Wang chuanyong, Jiang Li, Lan Jing, Zhang Jian, Li Wei. Application of atomic force microscopy in evaluation of three-dimensional morphology of eroded human enamel. Science and Technology Press, 2012, 47(6): 340-344.

[7] Ma SY, Cai JY, W u YZ, Zhan XW. Nanometer structural analysis of dental hard tissue by atomic force microscope [J]. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research, 2007, 11(18): 3536-3539.

[8] Habelitz S, Marshall S. J, Marshall G. W, Balooch M. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometer scale [J] .Archives of Oral Biology,2001, 46: 173-183.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(00)00089-3

[9] Poggio C, Lombardini M, Dagna A, Chiesa M, Bianchi S. Protective effect on enamel demineralization of a CPP-ACP paste: an AFM in vitro study[J]. Journal of Dentistry 2009; 37: 949–54.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2009.07.011

[10] Chen XM, Zhao YF. Oral Biomechanical [M]. Brijing: Published by Science Press Medical Branch. 2010: 60-230.

[11] Yeau-Ren Jeng, Tsung-Ting Lin, Hsiu-Ming Hsu, et al. Human enamel rod presents anisotropic nanotribological properties. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2011, 4: 515-522.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.12.002

[12] Zhao W, Wang YZ, Hong HL, Chen Z, Fan MW, Yu SF. The crystallographic properties of the mineral phases of enamel and dentin in normal deciduous and permanent tooth . Chinese Journal of Stomatology, 2002, 37(3): 219- 221.

[13] Binning G, Quate CF, Gerber CH. Atomic force microscope [J]. Phys Rev Lett, 1986, 56: 930-933.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.56.930

[14] Ten Care AR. Oral Histology: Development, Structure and Function[M]. 5th edition. St. Louis: Mosby,1998.218—235.

[15] Ge J, Cui FZ,Ji N,Yan JX. New observations of hierarchical structure of human enamel [J]. Chinese Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2006, 16(2): 61-66.

[16] Habelitz S, Marshall SJ, Marshall Jr GW, et al. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometer scale[J]. Arch Oral Biol., 2001, 46(2): 173-183.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(00)00089-3

[17] Ge J, Cui FZ, Wang XM, et al. Property variations in the prism and the organic sheath within enamel by nanoindentation[J].Biomateriais,2005,26(16):3333- 3339.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.07.059

[18] Ariyamtnam MT, Wilsen MA, Maekie IC, et al. A comparison of surface roughness and composite/enamel bond strength of human enamel following the application of the Nd: YAG laser and etching with phosphoric acid. Dent Mater, 1997, 13(1): 5 l- 55.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0109-5641(97)80008-5

[19] Marshall GW, Habelitz S, Gallagher R, et al. Nanomechanical properties of hydrated carious human dentin. J Dent Res, 2001, 80(8): 1768.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345010800081701

[20] Nalla RK, Kinney JH, Ritchie RO. Effect of orientation on the in vitro fracture toughness dentine: The role of toughening mechanisms. Biomaterials, 2003, 24(22): 3955.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00278-3

[21] Belli S, Eskitascioglu G, Eraslan O, et al. Effect of hybrid layer on stress distribution in a premolar tooth restored with composite or ceramic inlay: an FEM study [J].Biomed Mater Res B Apply Biomaters, 2005, 74(2): 665-668.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.30181