Home Range Shift and Dispersal of Red Deer: Implications for Establishing Nature Reserve Networks in China


Article Preview

The establishment of nature reserves is critical for saving endangered wild animal species, however, most of the reserves are separated by human settlements in China. It is unknown that how those animals inside the reserve adapted to the isolated environment in habitat use and dispersal. We studied red deer seasonal home range and dispersal by radio-tracking from 2006 to 2011 at Saihanwula Biosphere Reserve, Inner Mongolia. The results showed that home range sizes of female deer had seasonal differences with the smallest range in autumn and largest in spring which was different from home range variation of red deer in Europe. Home ranges overlapped between female deer, particularly in autumn and winter seasons. A young male showed dispersal behavior, several times during dispersal period it tried to find suitable habitat outside of the reserve. Our results indicated that a connected nature reserve network is needed to protect wild ungulates in China.



Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Edited by:

Ji Zhao, Aijie Wang, Xinyong Li and Xiaoyi Wang




W. D. Bao et al., "Home Range Shift and Dispersal of Red Deer: Implications for Establishing Nature Reserve Networks in China", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 955-959, pp. 2600-2606, 2014

Online since:

June 2014




* - Corresponding Author

[1] W.H. Burt, Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals, J. Mammal. 24 (1943) 346-352.

[2] R.A. Powell, Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators, in: L. Boitani, T.K. Fuller (Eds. ), Research Techniques in Animal Ecology: Controversies and Consequences, Columbia University Press, New York, 2000, pp.65-110.

[3] S. Luccarini, L. Mauri, S. Ciuti, P. Lamberti and M. Apollonio, Red deer (Cervus elaphus) spatial use in the Italian Alps: Home range patterns, seasonal migrations, and effects of snow and winter feeding, Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 18 (2006) 127-145.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927014.2006.9522718

[4] S.L. Lindstedt, B.J. Miller, S.W. Buskirk, Home-range, time, and body size in mammals, Ecology 67 (1986) 413-418.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1938584

[5] P.D. Mcloughlin, T. Coulson, T. Clutton-Brock, Cross-generational effects of habitat and density on life history in red deer, Ecology 89 (2008) 3317-3326.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/07-1044.1

[6] J.F. Kamler, B. Jedrzejewska, W. Jedrzejewski, Activity patterns of red deer in Bialowieza National Park, Poland, J. Mammal. 88 (2007) 508-514.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1644/06-mamm-a-169r.1

[7] M. Sandell, O. Liberg, Roamers, stayers: a model on male mating tactics and mating systems, Am. Nat. 139 (1992) 177-189.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/285319

[8] G. Cederlund, H. Sand, Dispersal of subadult moose (Alces alces) in a non migratory population, Can. J. Zool. 70 (1992) 1309-1314.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/z92-183

[9] J.P. Vincent, E. Bideau, A.J.M. Hewison, J.M. Angibault, The influence of increasing density on body weight, kid production, home range and winter grouping in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), J. Zool. 236 (1995) 371-382.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1995.tb02719.x

[10] J.L. Jeppesen, Impact of human disturbance on home range, movements and activity of red deer (Cervus elaphus) in a Danish environment, Danish Review of Game Biology 13 (1987) 1-38.

[11] D.F. Van, W.C. Klein, Response of elk to installation of oil wells, J. Mammal. 77 (1996) 1028-1041.

[12] J. Theuerkauf, S. Rouys, Habitat selection by ungulates in relation to predation risk by wolves and humans in the Bialowieza Forest, Forest Ecol. Manag. 256 (2008) 1325-1332.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.06.030

[13] S. Creel, J. Winnie, B. Maxwell, K. Hamlin, M. Creel, Elk alter habitat selection as an anti-predator response to wolves, Ecology 86 (2005) 3387-3397.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/05-0032

[14] I. Barja, S. Rosellini, Does habitat type modify group size in roe deer and red deer under predation risk by Iberian wolves? Can. J. Zool. 86 (2008) 170-176.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/z07-129

[15] H.L. Sheng, The Deer in China, East China Normal University Publishing House, Shanghai, (1992).

[16] S. Wang, China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Mammals, Science Press, Beijing, (1998).

[17] S.L. Zhang, Z.L. Wang, P. Zhang, Y.X. Yang, W. He, Study on the status of wild red deer populations in Chifeng City, Inner Mongolia, Sichuan J. Zool. 28 (2009) 772-776.

[18] S.L. Zhang, Study on plants diversity and conservation in Saihanwula nature reserve, Inner Mongolia, Dissertation, Beijing Forestry University, (2007).

[19] J.A. Nicholas, A.R. Peter, E.K. Robert, Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data, Ecology 75 (1993) 1313-1325.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1940062

[20] M.R. Fuller, J.J. Millspaugh, K.E. Church, R.E. Kenward, Wildlife radio telemetry, in: C.E. Braun (Eds. ), Techniques for wildlife investigations and management, 6th ed., The Wildlife Society, Maryland, 2005, pp.377-417.

[21] P.N. Hooge, B. Eichenlaub, Animal movement extension to ArcView ver. 2. 0. Anchorage: Alaska Science Center, Biological Science Office, U.S. Geological Survey, (2000).

[22] D.E. Seaman, J.J. Millspaugh, B.J. Kernohan, G.C. Brundige, K.J. Raedeke, R.A. Gitzen, Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates, J. Wildl. Manag. 63 (1999) 739-747.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3802664

[23] L. Börger, N. Franconi, M.G. De, A. Gantz, F. Meschi, A. Manica, S. Lovari, T. Coulson, Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range estimates, J. Anim. Ecol. 75 (2006) 1393-1405.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01164.x

[24] C.O. Kochanny, G.D. Delgiudice, J. Fieberg, Comparing global positioning system and very high frequency telemetry home ranges of white-tailed deer, J. Wildl. Manag. 73 (2009) 779-787.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2193/2008-394

[25] J.F. Kamler, W. Jedrzejewski, B. Jedrzejewska, Home ranges of red deer in a European old-growth forest, Am. Midl. Nat. 159 (2008) 75-82.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031(2008)159[75:hrordi]2.0.co;2

[26] B. Georgii, Home rang patterns of female red deer (Cervus elapus L. ) in the Alps, Oecologia 47 (1980) 278-285.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00346833

[27] M. Debeljak, S. Dzeroski, K. Jerina, A. Kobler, M. Adamic, Habitat suitability modeling for red deer (Cervus elaphus L. ) in South-central Slovenia with classification trees, Ecol. Model. 138 (2001) 321-330.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3800(00)00411-7

[28] J.Y. Chen, L.J. Zhang, A.M. Wang, Bater, Nasendelger, L. Yuan, W.D. Bao, Population, distribution and food composition of wolves (Canis lupus) at Saihanwula Nature Reserve, Inner Mongolia, Zool. Research 32 (2011) 232-235.

[29] I.M.R. Godvik, L.E. Loe, J.O. Vik, V. Veiberg, R. Langvatn, A. Mysterud, Temporal scales, trade-offs, and functional responses in red deer habitat selection, Ecology 90 (2009) 699-710.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/08-0576.1

[30] J.P. Wu, Y. Zhang, D.F. Fu, W.X. Lan, Comparison of home range of Siberian musk deer and goral in winter, J. Northeast Forestry University 36 (2008) 58-60.