Evaluation and Analysis of the Onlay Patellar Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract:

Article Preview

Complications in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), which may include the inaccuracy of the implantation and the poor component design, can cause major failures in the TKA. Therefore, the present investigation studies the onlay knee implants commonly used clinically to find the major causes of the damage to artificial patella by the computer aided analysis of the three-dimensional finite element model of the artificial patello-femoral joint built through reverse engineering. Results showed that although a significant difference is found in the condition and the state of the stress distribution generated as the patello-femoral joint changes with the flexion of the knees, this variation is still within the tolerable range; but the patellar lateral tilt is something that caught our attention. Furthermore, through the comparison between the study and the clinical results, this investigation concludes that the bone cement on the implant interface is the major cause for the breaking of the pegs, and is not related to the original design of the patella. This study also discovers that slight design modification on the parts of commonly used artificial joints may effectively reduce surgical failure rate; therefore, a more robust design configuration for patellar pegs is proposed.

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 97-101)

Edited by:

Zhengyi Jiang and Chunliang Zhang

Pages:

3773-3776

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.97-101.3773

Citation:

C. W. Liu et al., "Evaluation and Analysis of the Onlay Patellar Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty", Advanced Materials Research, Vols. 97-101, pp. 3773-3776, 2010

Online since:

March 2010

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] J.N. Insall, W.N. Scott: Surgery of the knee. (Churchill Livingstone, New York 2001).

[2] C.H. Huang, Y.M. Lee, and J.H. Lai: J. Arthroplasty Vol. 14 (1999), p.940.

[3] J.H. Heegaard, P.F. Leyvraz and C.B. Hovey: Clinical Biomechanics Vol. 16 (2001), p.415.

[4] J.K. Otto, J.J. Callaghan and T.D. Brown: 47 th Annual Meeting Orthopaedic Research Society, San Francisco, California (2001), p.25.

[5] C.M. Steubben, P.D. Postak and A.S. Greenwald: The Orthopaedic Research Laboratory, (The Mt. Sinai Medical Center. AAOS MK846393 1992).

[6] C.W. Liu: Master Thesis, (National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei 2002).

[7] C.M. Van and C.H. Wilson: Basic Orthopaedic Biomechanics. (Lippincott-Raven, New York 1997).

[8] T.Q. Lee, J.E. Budoff and F.E. Glaser: Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 366 (1999), p.274 (a) (b) M L M L 13. 83MPa 7. 95MPa 9. 12MPa.

In order to see related information, you need to Login.