Superelastic deformation of thin Ni–Ti wires containing various nanograined microstructures was investigated by tensile cyclic loading with in situ evaluation of electric resistivity. Defects created by the superelastic cycling in these wires were analyzed by transmission electron microscopy. The role of dislocation slip in superelastic deformation was considered. The Ni–Ti wires having the finest microstructures (grain diameter <100nm) were highly resistant to dislocation slip, while those with fully recrystallized microstructure and grain size exceeding 200nm were prone to dislocation slip. The density of the observed dislocation defects increased significantly with increasing grain size. The upper plateau stress of the superelastic stress–strain curves was largely grain size independent from 10 to 1000nm. It was thus claimed that the Hall–Petch relationship failed for the stress-induced martensitic transformation in this grain size range. It was proposed that dislocation slip taking place during superelastic cycling was responsible for the accumulated irreversible strains, cyclic instability and degradation of functional properties. No residual martensite phase was found in the microstructures of superelastically cycled wires by transmission electron microscopy and results of the in situ electric resistance measurements during straining also indirectly suggested that none or very little martensite phase remains in the studied cycled superelastic wires after unloading. The accumulation of dislocation defects, however, does not prevent the superelasticity. It only affects the shape of the stress–strain response, makes it unstable upon cycling and changed the deformation mode from localized to homogeneous. The activity of dislocation slip during superelastic deformation of Ni–Ti increased with increasing test temperature and ultimately destroys the superelasticity as the plateau stress approaches the yield stress for slip. Deformation twins in the austenite phase ({114} compound twins) were frequently found in cycled wires having largest grain size. It was proposed that they formed in the highly deformed B19′ martensite phase during forward loading and were retained in austenite after unloading. Such twinning would represent an additional deformation mechanism of Ni–Ti yielding residual irrecoverable strains.

Transmission Electron Microscopy Investigation of Dislocation Slip during Superelastic Cycling of Ni–Ti Wires. R.Delville, B.Malard, J.Pilch, P.Sittner, D.Schryvers: International Journal of Plasticity, 2011, 27[2], 282-97