Ammonia Synthesis Using Magnetically Induced Reaction


Article Preview

Ammonia production is a high energy and capital intensive industry as it requires high temperature (400500°C) and high pressure (150300 bar) for its daily operations. By introducing nanocatalyst with the new concept of micro-reactor with applied magnetic field induction, the catalytic activity can be induced and the output can be enhanced. Magneto-dynamics will be introduced in the ammonia production process in order to replace the concept of thermodynamics in the Haber Bosch process. The nanocatalysts (Y3Fe5O12, Fe2O3, MnO, Mn0.8Zn0.2Fe2O4) have been reduced by using the temperature reduction method (TPR). The Y3Fe5O12 (YIG) catalyst with magnetic induction produced242.56µmol/h.g-cat output of ammonia which is 2% much higher than ammonia synthesis without magnetic induction (237.52 µmol/g.h).The ammonia output based on the magnetic induction method at a temperature of 0°C is 242.56µmole/h.g-cat which is 0.90% higher than the synthesis at 25°C temperature (240.4 µmol/g.h). The ammonia output at 0.2Tesla is 249.04 µmole/h.g-cat which is higher 2.6% than the output at 0.1Tesla which is 242.56µmol/g.h. It is proven that the higher the applied magnetic field is, the more effective the catalytic activity will be as a better alignment of the electron spin of the catalyst occurs and enhances the adsorption and desorption process. Y3Fe5O12 (YIG) shows the best catalytic reaction followed by Fe2O3 (hematite) and MnO (manganese oxide). By this new route, synthesis of ammonia at low temperature is realized and offers ammonia producers an economic advantage compared to the classical routes.



Defect and Diffusion Forum (Volumes 334-335)

Edited by:

Prof. Andreas Öchsner, Prof. Graeme E. Murch, Ali Shokuhfar and Prof. João M.P.Q. Delgado




N. Yahya et al., "Ammonia Synthesis Using Magnetically Induced Reaction", Defect and Diffusion Forum, Vols. 334-335, pp. 329-336, 2013

Online since:

February 2013


[1] Chemsystems. Prospectus (September 2009/2010). (2011). Ammonia. Retrieved November 09, 2011 from www. chemsystem. com.

[2] Ammonia and Urea Strategic Business Analysis. Retrieved April 20, 2011 from, www. chemsytem. com.

[3] C. M. Roebuck (2004), Excel HSC Chemistry, 1sted. New South Wales, Australia: Pascal Press, p.35–41.

[4] K.N. Whitten, R.E. Davis, M.L. Peck, G.G. Stanley, (2003), General Chemistry Thomson Brookscole, 7, pp.713-720.

[5] G.A. Samorjai (1994), Introduction to Surface Chemistry and Catalysis, 1st ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley Interscience.

[6] W. Rarog-Pilecka, E. Miskiewics, D. Szmigiel, Z. Kowalczyk, (2008), Journal of Catalysis Vol. 231, pp.11-19.

[7] Richardson, James T. (2009). Journal of Applied Catalyst. Issue 3, (pp.1781-1786).

[8] W.K. Jozwiak, E. Kaczmarek. (2007). Applied Catalysis A: General Vol. 326, Issue 1 (pp.17-27).

[9] M.A. Ullmann1, A. da C. Schneid, D. Bianchini. Thermal catalytic properties of Mn supported on porous silica nanostructures. Article from Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brasil.

[10] Oliveira, L.C.A., Fabris, J.D., Rios, R.R.V.A., Mussel, W.N., Lago, R.M. (2004): Appl. Catal. A Gen. 259, (p.253–259).

[11] F.G. Duran, B. P. Barbero, L.E. Cadus, C. Rojas, M.A. Centeno, J. A. Odriozola (2009), Applied Catalyst B: Environmental, vol. 92, pp.194-201.

[12] C.T. Rodgers (2009). Pure and Applied Chemistryvol. 81, (p.19–43).

[13] O. Yu. Goncharov, Yu.P. Vorobiov and O.V. Carban (1997), Journal of Physics IV France 07 C1. pp.185-186. DOI: 10. 1051/jp4: 1997168.