Can Non-Destructive Stress and Microstructure Analysis Support the Fracture Risk Assessment? A Discussion based on the IZFP Experience


Article Preview

Using computer simulations the influence of different standard deviations of the yield strength, ultimate tensile strength and of Kc values on the probability of the crack growth in an Al-alloy pressure vessel is studied. The state of art of non destructive materials characterization as it is achieved at the IZFP is demonstrated by experimental results of non destructive stress analysis, evaluation of strength data and of materials state characterization. The goals of future developments are clear: in case of components made by Al alloys, the combined use of the ultrasonic and eddy current techniques and in case of steel components, the additional use of micro magnetic techniques have to be enforced. The miniaturization of the sensors and the continuation of the experimental investigation of the correlation between the strength and Kc data on one side and the materials structure as characterized by non destructive tools on the other side are the next steps.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 261-263)

Edited by:

Kikuo Kishimoto, Masanori Kikuchi, Tetsuo Shoji and Masumi Saka




E. Schneider and D. Cioclov, "Can Non-Destructive Stress and Microstructure Analysis Support the Fracture Risk Assessment? A Discussion based on the IZFP Experience", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 261-263, pp. 865-874, 2004

Online since:

April 2004




[1] D. D. Cioclov and M. Kröning, 1999 ASME PVP Conference, Vol. 386 (1999) p.115.

[2] D. D. Cioclov: PVFAD – Probabilistic Failure Assessment Diagram; Fracture analysis software guide, PVFAD, Version Y10. 2000; CEC Saarbrücken.

[3] W. D. Rummel, G.L. Hardy and T. D. Cooper, Metals Handbook 17, 9 th Edition, Metal Park Ohio, ASM International, p.674.

[4] I. S. Raju and J. C. Newman, Journal of Pressure Vessels Technology, Vol. 102, p.342.

[5] W. A. Theiner: in V. Hauk: Structural and Residual Stress Analysis by Nondestructive Methods; Elsevier Science B. V. Amsterdam (1997) p.564.

[6] W. A. Theiner, 1st Internat. Conference on Barkhausen Noise and Micromagnetic Testing; (1998).

[7] E. Schneider: D82, Diss. RWTH Aachen, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag Stuttgart (2000).

[8] R. Becker and M. Disqué, DGZfP Berichtsband 52. 1, DGZfP Berlin (1996) p.365.

[9] E. Schneider, M. Kröning: DGZfP Zeitung, DGZfP Berlin(1999) 66, p.54.

[10] E. Schneider, L. Oesterlein, D. Bruche, 6th European Conference on Non Destructive Testing (1994) p.1013.