Effect of Initial Lean on Scaling of Postural Feedback Responses


Article Preview

We examined how the central nervous system adjusts postural responses to an increased postural challenge due to an initial lean. Postural feedback responses scale to accommodate biomechanical constraints, such as an allowable ankle joint torque. Initial forward leaning, which is observed among the elderly who are inactive or afraid of falling, brings subjects near to the limit of stability and makes the biomechanical constraints more difficult to obey. We hypothesized that the central nervous system is aware of body dynamics and restrains postural responses when subjects initially lean forward. To test this hypothesis, fast backwards perturbations of various magnitudes were applied to 12 healthy young subjects (3 male, 9 female) aged 20 to 32 years. The subjects were instructed to stand quietly on a hydraulic servo-controlled force platform with their arms crossed over their chests, then to recover from a perturbation by returning to their upright position, without stepping or lifting their heels off the ground, if possible. Initially, the subjects were either standing upright or leaning forward. The force platform was movable in the translational direction and programmed to move backward with various ramp displacements ranging from 1.2 to 15 cm, all with the duration of 275 msec. For each trial, the kinematics and ground reaction force data were recorded, then used to compute the net joint torques, employing a least squares inverse dynamics method. Optimization methods were used to identify a set of equivalent feedback control gains for each trial so that the biomechanical model incorporating this feedback control would reproduce the empirical response. The results showed that the kinematics, joint torque, and feedback gains gradually scaled as a function of the perturbation magnitude before they reached the biomechanical constraint, and the scaling became more severe with an initial forward lean. For example, the model suggested that the magnitude of the ankle joint angle feedback to ankle torque was smaller in the leaning trials than in the initially upright trials, as if the subjects experienced a larger postural perturbation in the leaning trials. These results imply that the central nervous system restrained the postural responses to accommodate the additional biomechanical constraint imposed by the forward posture, thereby suggesting that the central nervous system is aware of body dynamics and biomechanical constraints. The scaling of the postural feedback gains with the perturbation magnitude and initial lean indicates that the postural control can be interpreted as a feedback scheme with scalable gains.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 277-279)

Edited by:

Kwang Hwa Chung, Yong Hyeon Shin, Sue-Nie Park, Hyun Sook Cho, Soon-Ae Yoo, Byung Joo Min, Hyo-Suk Lim and Kyung Hwa Yoo




S. Y. Park et al., "Effect of Initial Lean on Scaling of Postural Feedback Responses", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 277-279, pp. 142-147, 2005

Online since:

January 2005




[1] H.C. Diener, F.B. Horak and L.M. Nashner: Influence of stimulus parameters on human postural responses. Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 59 (1988), pp.1888-905.

[2] F.B. Horak, H.C. Diener and L.M. Nashner: Influence of central set on human postural responses. Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 62 (1989), pp.841-53.

[3] F.B. Horak and L.M. Nashner: Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 55 (1986), pp.1369-81.

[4] C.F. Runge, C.L. Chupert, F.B. Horak and F.E. Zajac: Ankle and hip postural strategies defined by joint torques. Gait & Posture Vol. 10 (1999), pp.161-70. Title of Publication (to be inserted by the publisher).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-6362(99)00032-6

[5] F.B. Horak, S.M. Henry and A. Shumway-Cook: Postural perturbations: new insights for treatment of balance disorders. Physical Therapy Vol. 77 (1997), pp.517-33.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/77.5.517

[6] F.B. Horak, J. Frank and J.G. Nutt: Effects of dopamine on postural control in Parkinsonian subjects: scaling, set and tone. Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 75 (1996), pp.2380-2396.

[7] F.B. Horak, J.G. Nutt and L.M. Nashner: Postural inflexibility in parkinsonian subjects. Journal of the Neurological Sciences Vol. 111 (1992), pp.46-58.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-510x(92)90111-w

[8] M.J. Gu, A.B. Schultz, N.T. Shepard and N.B. Alexander: Postural control in young and elderly adults when stance is perturbed: dynamics. Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 29 (1996), pp.319-29.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(95)00052-6

[9] B.E. Maki and W.E. McIlroy: Influence of arousal and attention on the control of postural sway. Journal of Vestibular Research Vol. 6 (1996), pp.53-59.

[10] A.P. Woodhull-McNeal: Changes in posture and balance with age. Aging Vol. 4 (1992), pp.219-225.

[11] B.E. Maki and R.S. Whitelaw: Influence of expectation and arousal on center-of-pressure responses to transient postural perturbations. Journal of Vestibular Research Vol. 3 (1993), pp.25-39.

[12] N.B. Alexander: Postural control in older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Vol. 42 (1994), pp.93-108.

[13] F.B. Horak and S.P. Moore: The effect of prior leaning on human postural responses. Gait & Posture Vol. 1 (1993), pp.203-10.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0966-6362(93)90047-5

[14] R. Fitzpatrick, D. Burke and S.C. Gandevia: Loop gain of reflexes controlling human standing measured with the use of postural and vestibular disturbances. Journal of Neurophysiology Vol. 76 (1996), pp.3994-4008.

[15] A. Rossi and B. Decchi: Flexibility of lower limb reflex responses to painful cutaneous stimulation in standing humans: evidence of load-dependent modulation. Journal of Physiology Vol. 481 (1994), pp.521-32.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.1994.sp020460

[16] H. Hemami: Modeling, control, and simulation of human movement. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering Vol. 13 (1985), pp.1-34.

[17] H. Hemami and B. Stokes: A Qualitative discussion of mechanisms of feedback and feedforward in the control of locomotion. IEEE transactopms on biomedical engineering Vol. 30 (1983), pp.681-689.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/tbme.1983.325180

[18] L.M. Nashner and G. McCollum: The organization of human postural movements: A formal basis and experimental synthesis. Behavioral and brain sciences Vol. 8 (1985), pp.135-172.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00020008

[19] S. Park, F.B. Horak, A.D. Kuo: Postural Feedback Responses Scale with Biomechancial Constraints in Human Standing, Experimental Brain Research Vol . 154 (2004), pp.417-427.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1674-3

[20] A.D. Kuo: An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering Vol. 42 (1995), pp.87-101.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/10.362914

[21] A.D. Kuo: A least-square estimation approach to imporving the precision of inverse dynamics computations. Transactions of the ASME: Bioengineering Vol. 120 (1998), pp.148-159.

[22] A.D. Kuo, R.A. Speers, R.J. Peterka and F.B. Horak: Effect of altered sensory conditions on multivariate descriptors of human postural sway. Experimental Brain Research Vol. 122 (1998), pp.185-95.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002210050506

[23] R.A. Speers, W.H. Paloski and A.D. Kuo: Multivariate changes in coordination of postural control following spaceflight. Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 31 (1998), pp.883-889.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9290(98)00065-7

[24] A.D. Kuo and F.E. Zajac: A biomechanical analysis of muscle strength as a limiting factor in standing posture. Journal of Biomechanics Vol. 26 (1993), pp.137-50.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(93)90085-s