An Optimal Estimator Model of Multi-Sensory Processing in Human Postural Control


Article Preview

We hypothesized that multi-sensory processing at the central nervous system (CNS) in human postural control can be described using an optimal estimator model. The estimates on body dynamics from multi-sensory signals contain sensory noise, transmission delays, and process disturbances. The state estimates approximate actual body movement. Erroneous estimates degrade the performance of feedback control and could cause a loss of balance if distorted severely. To test the hypothesis, we examined the frequency response of a visually-induced postural sway with stimulus frequency ranging from 0.075 to 1Hz and established an optimal estimator model. Two healthy young (33yrs ± 1) subjects stood on a force platform located 1.25m behind a projection screen with their arms crossed over their chests. They were asked to maintain an upright posture against the sinusoidal visual field stimuli. Each sinusoidal visual stimulus was generated by a projector for 200secs in pitch direction with a maximum pitch angle of 20o. Kinematics data was recorded to calculate the frequency response function of the center of mass (COM). There were three components in the modeling procedure: a biomechanical model of body and sensor dynamics, a linear feedback control model to stabilize the biomechanical model, and a state estimator to estimate body dynamic states based on multi-sensory outputs. We modeled the sensor dynamics of the semicircular canal, otolth, vision, and muscle spindles at the ankle and hip joint. We used the Kalman filter and linear quadratic regulator to determine feedback gains. Results showed that the frequency response function of a visually-induced postural sway decreased as stimulus frequency increased, and this low-pass filtering characteristic with an approximate cutoff frequency of 0.2Hz was also simulated by the postural feedback control model with optimal estimator. Low-pass filtering characteristics of the frequency response are mainly due to body and sensor dynamics, which show reduced responses for high frequency stimulus. The Kalman filter represents that the CNS utilizes redundant sensory information in a way that minimizes discrepancies between actual body dynamics and estimated body dynamics based on sensory output and an internal model. The results suggest that the CNS may make use of an internal representation of body dynamics, and can integrate sensory information in an optimal way to best estimate human postural responses.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 277-279)

Edited by:

Kwang Hwa Chung, Yong Hyeon Shin, Sue-Nie Park, Hyun Sook Cho, Soon-Ae Yoo, Byung Joo Min, Hyo-Suk Lim and Kyung Hwa Yoo




S. Y. Park and A. D. Kuo, "An Optimal Estimator Model of Multi-Sensory Processing in Human Postural Control", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 277-279, pp. 148-154, 2005

Online since:

January 2005




[1] R.A. Schmidt: Motor control and learning : a behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics, Champaign, Ill, (1988), pp.517-555.

[2] F.B. Horak, L.M. Nashner, and H.C. Diener: Postural strategies associated with somatosensory and vestibular loss. Exp. Brain. Res. Vol. 82 (1990), pp.167-77.


[3] P.J. Loughlin, M.S. Redfern and J.M. Furman: Time-varying characteristics of visually induced postural sway. IEEE Trans. Rehab. Eng. Vol. 4 (1996), pp.416-24.


[4] J.H. Allum and F. Honegger: A postural model of balance-correcting movement strategies. J. Vest. Res. Vol. 2 (1992), pp.327-47.

[5] M.H. Woollacott, A. Shumway-Cook and L.M. Nashner: Aging and posture control: changes in sensory organization and muscular coordination. Int. J. Aging. Hum. Dev. Vol. 23 (1986), pp.97-114.


[6] N.B. Alexander: Postural control in older adults. J. Am. Ger. Soc. Vol. 42 (1994), pp.93-108. Title of Publication (to be inserted by the publisher).

[7] F. Lestienne, J. Soechting and A. Berthoz: Postural readjustments induced by linear motion of visual scenes. Exp. Brain. Res. Vol. 28 (1977), pp.363-84.


[8] E.A. Keshner and R.V. Kenyon: The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses. J. Vest. Res. Vol. 10 (2000), pp.207-19.

[9] G. Clement and C. Lathan: Postural reactions induced by vertical motion of visual scenes and the effects of weightlessness. Acta Oto-Laryngol. Vol. 118 (1998), pp.466-73.


[10] R.J. Peterka and M.S. Benolken: Role of somatosensory and vestibular cues in attenuating visually induced human postural sway. Exp. Brain. Res. Vol. 105 (1995), pp.101-10.


[11] M. Krizkova and F. Hlavacka: Binaural monopolar galvanic vestibular stimulation reduces body sway during human stance. Physiol. Res. Vol. 43 (1994), pp.187-92.

[12] M. Magnusson, R. Johansson and J. Wiklund: Galvanically induced body sway in the anterior-posterior plane. Acta Oto-Laryngol. Vol. 110 (1990), pp.11-7.


[13] P. Fransson, R. Johansson, A. Hafstrom and M. Magnusson: Methods for evaluation of postural control adaptation. Gait & Posture. Vol. 12 (2000), pp.14-24.


[14] T. Merfner, C. Mauer, and R.J. Perterka: A multisensory posture control model of human uptight stance. Prog. Brain. Res. Vol. 142 (2003), pp.189-201.

[15] J.M. Hillis, M.O. Ernst, M.S. Banks, and M.S. Landy: Combining sensory information: mandatory fusion within, but not between, senses. Science. Vol. 298 (2002), pp.1627-1630.


[16] J. Jeka, K.S. Oie and T. Kiemel: Multisensory information for human postural control: integrating touch and vision. Exp. Brain. Res. Vol. 134 (2000), pp.107-25.


[17] H. van der Kooij, R. Jacobs, B. Koopman and H. Grootenboer: A multisensory integration model of human stance control. Biol. Cybern. Vol. 80 (1999), pp.299-308.


[18] D.M. Wolpert, Z. Ghahramani and M.I. Jordan: An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science. Vol. 269 (1995), pp.1880-2.


[19] H. van der Kooij, R. Jacobs, B. Koopman and F. van der Helm: An adaptive model of sensory integration in a dynamic environment applied to human stance control. Biol. Cybern. Vol. 84 (2001), pp.103-115.


[20] M.O. Ernst and M.S. Banks: Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature. Vol. 415 (2002), pp.429-433.


[21] K.P. Kording and D.M. Wolpert: Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature. Vol. 427 (2004), 244-247.


[22] A.D. Kuo: A least-square estimation approach to imporving the precision of inverse dynamics computations. Trans. ASME. Bioeng. Vol. 120 (1998), pp.148-159.

[23] S. Park, F.B. Horak, A.D. Kuo: Postural Feedback Responses Scale with Biomechancial Constraints in Human Standing. Exp. Brain. Res. Vol . 154 (2004), pp.417-427.


[24] S. Park: Human standing postural control adjusts to biomechanical constraints: Is the CNS using multiple control plans, or as a single flexible control plan? Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Michigan (2002).

[25] K. Barin: Evaluation of a generalized model of human postural dynamics and control in the sagittal plane. Biol. Cybern. Vol. 61 (1989), pp.37-50.


[26] H. Hemami and A. Katbab: Constrained inverted pendulum model of evaluating upright postural stability. J. Dyn. Sys. Meas. Control. Vol. 104 (1982), pp.343-349. Title of Publication (to be inserted by the publisher).


[27] A.D. Kuo and F.E. Zajac: A biomechanical analysis of muscle strength as a limiting factor in standing posture. J. Biomech. Vol. 26 (1993), pp.137-50.

[28] F.B. Horak and L.M. Nashner: Central programming of postural movements: adaptation to altered support-surface configurations. J. Neurophysiol. Vol. 55 (1986), pp.1369-81.

[29] A.D. Kuo: An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. Vol. 42 (1995), pp.87-101.


[30] R.A. Speers, W.H. Paloski and A.D. Kuo: Multivariate changes in coordination of postural control following spaceflight. J. Biomech. Vol. 31 (1998), pp.883-889.