Radioactivity Analysis of DUPIC Fuel Fabrication Process According to Burn-Up and Cooling Time


Article Preview

A radioactivity analysis of OREOX and the sintering steps for the DUPIC fuel fabrication process has been conducted. This study utilized ORIGEN2 code to calculate and analyze the radioactivity of spent fuels for various burn-up and cooling times. The analysis results have shown that the activity reduction of spent fuels after DUPIC fuel fabrication process was 40∼51 % and higher with longer burn-up and cooling times. This study also shows that the distribution of gaseous waste generated from OREOX process is mainly attributed to Kr, Ru and H-3, regardless of burn-up and cooling times. On the other hand, in the off-gas of the sintering process, the radioactivity distribution of Cs is more than 98 %, regardless of burn-up and cooling times.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 277-279)

Edited by:

Kwang Hwa Chung, Yong Hyeon Shin, Sue-Nie Park, Hyun Sook Cho, Soon-Ae Yoo, Byung Joo Min, Hyo-Suk Lim and Kyung Hwa Yoo




J. M. Shin et al., "Radioactivity Analysis of DUPIC Fuel Fabrication Process According to Burn-Up and Cooling Time ", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 277-279, pp. 475-480, 2005

Online since:

January 2005




[1] M.S. Yang, I.H. Jung, J.W. Lee, H.B. Choi, J.J. Park, K.K. Bae, J.S. Lee and H.S. Park: Prospect and Challenges of DUPIC Development in Korea, Proceedings of the 11th Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference, p.1305, CNS, Banff, Canada, May (1998).

[2] A.G. Croft: A User's Manual for the ORIGEN2 Computer Code (ORNL/TM-7175, Oak Lidge National Laboratory 1980).

[3] D. Majumdar, S.N. Jahshan, C.M. Allison, P. Kuan, and T.R. Thomas: Recycling of Nuclear Spent Fuel with AIROX Processing (U. S. Department of energy Idaho Field Office, DOE/ID10423, December, 1992).


[4] Z. Liu, D.D. Semeniuk, R.F. O'Connor, T. Kunkel, and R.S. Dickson: Report on the HOX2 Experiment: Fission-Product Release and Trapping during the OREOX and Sintering Processes, AECL Report RC-1840, DUPIC-AE-002, AECL, Chalk River, Ontario (1998).

[5] SCIECOM-219-96: Conceptual Design and Cost Evaluation of the DUPIC Fuel Fabrication Facility Final Report (SCIENTECH, Inc., and Gamma Engineering Corp., U.S.A. 1996).

[6] C.A. Bollmann, M.J. Driscoll, and M.S. Kazimi: Environmental Economic Performance of Direct Use of PWR Spent Fuel in CANDU Reactors (Department of Nuclear Engineering Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, U.S.A. 1998).

[7] J.H. Kim, J.M. Shin, G.I. Park, S.H. Nam, J.J. Park, J.W. Lee, and M.S. Yang: A Study on the Fission Product Release Behavior during DUPIC Pellet Fabrication and the Characteristics of Cesium Trapping, Proceedings of 2001 Korea-China Joint Workshop on Nuclear Waste Management, Taejon, Korea, November (2001).