Prefabricated Vascularized Bone Graft Using Autologous Tissue, Biomaterials, and Growth Factors: A New Technique for Bone Reconstruction


Article Preview

Although clinically, grafting of vascularized autologous bone has been preferably performed, there are some disadvantages for this grafting therapy, such as the limited availability of donor site and the clinical difficulty to harvest the bone graft of desired shape and size. As one trial, we have designed a prefabricated vascularized bone graft by combining autologous vessels, particulate cancellous bone and marrow (PCBM), and β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) with a biodegradable membrane. However, the volume of vascularized bone tissue newly formed was small and the density was low. In this study, the controlled system of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) was combined with the conventional preparation method to improve the nature of vascularized bone graft. The femur vessels of rabbits were rolled with a membrane of L-lactide-ε-caploractone copolymer. Hydrogel microspheres of gelatin were prepared as the release carrier of bFGF. Autologous PCBM harvested from the beforehand tibia of rabbits was mixed with β-TCP granules with or without the microspheres incorporating bFGF and packed into the rolled membrane. When bone formation was assessed at different time intervals, additional mixing of bFGF significantly increased the volume of vascularized bone tissue compared to that without bFGF. It is concluded that combination of bFGF release system was a promising method to prefabricate the bone graft of large size with good blood circulation.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 288-289)

Edited by:

Xingdong Zhang, Junzo Tanaka, Yaoting Yu and Yasuhiko Tabata




A. Hokugo et al., "Prefabricated Vascularized Bone Graft Using Autologous Tissue, Biomaterials, and Growth Factors: A New Technique for Bone Reconstruction", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 288-289, pp. 51-54, 2005

Online since:

June 2005




[1] Marx R.E. and Johnson R.P. Studies in the radiobiology of osteoradionecrosis and their clinical significance. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. 64 (1987), 379.


[2] Komisar, A. The functional results of mandibular reconstruction. Laryngoscope 100, (1990), 364.

[3] Heiple, K.G., Chase, S.W., and Herndon, C.H. A comparative study of the healing process following different types of bone transplantation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 45, 1593, (1963).


[4] Weiland, A.J., Phillips, T.W., and Randolph, M.A. Bone grafts: a radiologic, histologic, and biomechanical model comparing autografts, allografts, and free vascularized bone grafts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 74, 368, (1984).


[5] Hokugo A., Kubo Y, Takahashi Y, Horiuchi K, Fukuda A, Mushimoto K, Morita S, and Tabata Y. Prefabrication of vascularized bone graft using guided bone regeneration. Tissue Engineering 10: 978-986 (2004).


[6] Taylor, G.I., Miller, G.D.H., and Ham, F.J. The free vascularized bone graft. A clinical extension of microvascular techniques. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 55, 533, (1975).


[7] Erol, O.O., and Spira, M. Development and utilization of a composite island flap employing omentum: experimental investigation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 65, 405, (1980).


[8] Celik, M., Tuncer, S., Emekli, U., and Kesim, S.N. Histologic analysis of prefabricated, vascularized bone grafts: an experimental study in rabbits. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 58, 292, (2000).