Fatigue Analysis of Nuclear Welded Structures Based on Structural Stress and Elasto-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Approach

Abstract:

Article Preview

In the paper, the validity of the modified mesh-insensitive SS (structural stress) procedure to apply to the welded joints with local thickness variation is identified via the comparison of SCFs (stress concentration factors) calculated for various FE (finite element) models. FCI (fatigue crac kinitiation) cycles are determined by using the SS/EPFM (elasto-plastic fracture mechanics) approach and the various fatigue crack growth models. Fatigue test is performed to identify the validity of the fatigue analysis results. Finally, as a result of comparison among test and various analysis results, it is found that the SS/FM (fracture mechanics) approach agrees well with the fatigue test results over all cycle regions and the SS/EPFM approach is more reliable than the SS/LEFM (linear elastic fracture mechanics) approach.

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 297-300)

Edited by:

Young-Jin Kim, Dong-Ho Bae and Yun-Jae Kim

Pages:

774-780

DOI:

10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.297-300.774

Citation:

J. S. Kim and T. E. Jin, "Fatigue Analysis of Nuclear Welded Structures Based on Structural Stress and Elasto-Plastic Fracture Mechanics Approach ", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 297-300, pp. 774-780, 2005

Online since:

November 2005

Export:

Price:

$35.00

[1] P. Dong: Structural stress definition and numerical implementation for fatigue analysis of welded joints, Int. J. of fatigue Vol. 23 (2001), pp.865-876.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(01)00055-x

[2] H. Adib and G. Pluvinage: Theoretical and numerical aspects of the volumetric approach for fatigue life prediction in notched components, Int. J. of Fatigue Vol. 25 (2003), pp.67-76.

DOI: 10.1016/s0142-1123(02)00040-3

[3] P. Dong, J.K. Hong and Z. Cao: Mesh-insensitive structural stress procedure for fatigue evaluation of welded structures, Int. Institute of Welding, IIW Doc. XIII-1902-01/XV-1089-01 (July, 2001).

[4] H.B. Park and O.K. Chopra: A fracture mechanics approach for estimating fatigue crack initia- tion in carbon and low-alloy steels in LWR coolant environments, ASME PVP 2000, PVP-Vol. 410-2 (2000), pp.3-11.

[5] H. Tada, P. Paris and G. Irwin: The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, 2nd Edn, Paris Produc-tions Incorporated, St. Louis, Missouri (1985).

[6] British energy: Assessment of the Integrity of Structures Containing Defects, R6, Ver. 4 (2000).

[7] K. Tokaji, et al.: The growth of small fatigue cracks in low carbon steel; the effect of microstructure and limitation of linear elastic fracture mechanics, Fatigue Frac. Eng. Mater, Struct. Vol. 9 (1986), pp.205-217.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1986.tb00447.x

[8] D.J. Gavenda, et al.: Crack initiation and growth behavior of carbon and low-alloy steels, Fati-gue and Fracture 1, PVP 350, ASME (1997), pp.243-225.

DOI: 10.2172/505296

[9] D. Taylor and J.F. Knott: Fatigue crack propagation behavior of short crack; the effect of microstructure, Fatigue Frac. Eng. Mater. Struct. Vol. 4 (1981), pp.147-155.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2695.1981.tb01116.x

[10] N.E. Dowling: Crack growth during low-cycle fatigue of smooth axial specimens, ASTM STP 637 (1997), pp.97-121.

DOI: 10.1520/stp27990s

[11] K.J. Miller: Initiation and growth of short fatigue cracks, Fundamentals of Deformation and Fracture, B.A. Balley, K.J. Miller and J.R. Willis, eds (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1985), pp.477-500.

[12] P.D. Hobson: The formation of a crack growth equation for short cracks, Fatigue Frac. Eng. Mater. Struct. Vol. 5 (1982), pp.323-327.

[13] E.D. Eason, et al.: Analysis of pressure vessel steel fatigue test in air, Nucl. Eng. and Design, Vol. 115 (1989), pp.23-30.

[14] O.K. Chopra and W.J. Shack: Overview of fatigue crack initiation in carbon and low-alloy steels in light water reactor environments, J. of PVT, Trans. of ASME Vol. 121 (1999), pp.49-60.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2883667

In order to see related information, you need to Login.