Measurement of Alloying Degree of Galvannealed Steels by X-Ray Diffraction


Article Preview

Galvannealed steels are produced by reheating of Zinc-coated steels, in which the iron and the zinc are interdiffused to form Zn-Fe intermatallic compound. In recent years, application of galvannealed steel has increased due to its excellent corrosion resistance, good weldability and paintability. Galvannealed production requires strict control of processing conditions to obtain an optimal alloying degree in the coatings. The analysis of the alloying degree is very important since they are closely related to the corrosion and mechanical properties. This study is measurement of alloying degree of the galvannealed steel by using the XRD. Partial least squares (PLS) model is a powerful multivariate tool that has been successfully applied to the quantitative analysis of data in XRD. The alloying degree was determined by using PLS regression to a concentration accuracy of 0.2%. The XRD analysis and proposed PLS model can be successfully used to determine the alloying degree of industrially produced galvannealed steel.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 321-323)

Edited by:

Seung-Seok Lee, Joon Hyun Lee, Ik Keun Park, Sung-Jin Song, Man Yong Choi




H. K. Park et al., "Measurement of Alloying Degree of Galvannealed Steels by X-Ray Diffraction", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 321-323, pp. 1461-1464, 2006

Online since:

October 2006




[1] F. E. Goodwin: Zinc based steel coating system (TMS, Warrendale, PA, 1998).

[2] Kil Dong Lee, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 38, 33 (2001).

[3] T. C. Huang, X-Ray Spectrum. 20, 29 (1991).

[4] M. H. J. Bekkers and H. A. van Sprang, X-ray Spectrum. 26, 122 (1997).

[5] W. H. Lee, B. S. Cho, B. J. Kang, J. Y. Kim, J. G. Lee, C. O. Jeong and Y. G. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 40, 11 (2002).

[6] D. Jones, 50th Chemists' Conference- Ashorne Hill May 4-6, (1999).

[7] Y. Matsumoto, N. Fujino, and S. Tsuchiya, Trans. ISIJ 28, 957 (1988).

[8] S. Mori, K. Takeuchi and Y. Matsumoto, The Iron and Steel, 82, 917 (1996).

[9] S. Wold, M. Sjostrom and L. Eriksson, Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 58, 109 (2001).