Protuberant Morphology of Electrospun Polymeric Fibers


Article Preview

A highly concentrated solution of polystyrene (PS) in N,N-dimethyl formamide (DMF) was electrospun and the surface morphology of the electrospun PS fibers was investigated. Unlike the porous morphology observed on the surface of the fibers electrospun from the PS solution in a volatile solvent, e.g. tetrahydrofuran, a regular protuberance morphology was found on the surface of the fibers electrospun from the PS solution in the non-volatile solvent, DMF. This unique surface morphology was formed due to the presence of residual DMF solvent inside the electrospun PS fiber. Due to the large diameter of the PS fibers (~5 to ~10 μm) formed from the highly viscous PS solution, the DMF could not evaporate completely from inside them during the electrospinning process. Therefore, the extrusive force of the residual solvent inside the fiber induced the formation of a unique surface morphology. We believe that this unique surface morphology increases the surface area of the electrospun fibers, thus making it possible to control their wetting or adsorption behavior.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 326-328)

Edited by:

Soon-Bok Lee and Yun-Jae Kim




M. S. Kang et al., "Protuberant Morphology of Electrospun Polymeric Fibers", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 326-328, pp. 1849-1852, 2006

Online since:

December 2006




[1] D. Li and Y. Xia: Adv. Mater. Vol. 16 (2004), p.1151.

[2] M. Bognitzki, W. Czado, T. Frese, A. Schaper, M. Hellwig, M. Steinhart, A. Greiner, J.H. Wendorff, Adv. Mater. Vol. 13 (2001), p.70.


[3] J. Doshi and D.H. Reneker: J. Electrost. Vol. 35 (1995), p.151.

[4] Y.M. Shin, M.M. Hohman, M.P. Brenner and G.C. Rutledge: Applied Physics Letters Vol. 78 (2001), p.1149.

[5] E.H. Sanders, R. Kloefkorn, G.L. Bowlin, D.G. Simpson and G.E. Wnek: Macromolecules Vol. 36 (2003), p.3803.

[6] F. Ko, Y. Gogotsi, A. Ali, N. Naguib, H. Ye, G. Yang, C. Li and P. Willis: Adv. Mater. Vol. 15 (2003), p.1161.

[7] H. -J. Jin, S.V. Fridrikh, G.C. Rutledge and D.L. Kaplan: Biomacromolecules Vol. 3 (2002), p.1233.

[8] K. Kim, C. Chang, Y.K. Luu, D. Fang, B.S. Hsiao, B. Chu and M. Hadjiargyrou: J. Control. Release Vol. 98 ( 2004), p.47.

[9] M. Bognitzki, H. Hou, M. Ishaque, T. Frese, M. Hellwig, C. Schwarte, A. Schaper, J.H. Wendorff and A. Greiner: Adv. Mater. Vol. 12 (2000), p.637.


[10] D. A. Czaplewski, J. Kameoka, R. Mathers, G. W. Coates and H. G. Craighead: Appl. Phys. Lett. Vol. 83 (2003), p.4836.

[11] T. Jarusuwannapoom, W. Hongrojjanawiwat, S. Jitjaicham, L. Wannatong, M. Nithitanakul, C. Pattamaprom, P. Koombhongse, R. Rangkupan and P. Supahol: Euro. Polym. J. Vol. 41 (2005), p.409.


[12] L. Wannatong, A. Sirivat and P. Supaphol: Polym. Int. Vol. 53 (2004), p.1851.

[13] S. Koombhongse, W. Liu and D.H. Reneker, J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys Vol. 39 (2001), p.2598.

[14] K.H. Lee, H.Y. Kim, H.J. Bang, Y.H. Jung and S.G. Lee: Polymer Vol. 44 (2003), p.4029.

[15] S. Megelski, J.S. Stephens, D.B. Chase and J.F. Rabolt, Macromolecules Vol. 35 (2002), p.8456.

[16] C.L. Casper, J.S. Stephens, N.G. Tassi, D.B. Chase and J.F. Rabolt: Macromolecules Vol. 37 (2004), p.573.