A New Ultrasound Technique for Osteoporosis: Analysis of Broadband Attenuation Images of the Calcaneus


Article Preview

Most ultrasound diagnosing systems for osteoporosis lack diagnostic precision due to the measurement of specific regions of interest (ROI). As well as using the existing ROI measurement method, this study introduced the concept of analyzing the distribution patterns of bone quality. Linear scanning and ultrasound transmission techniques were used to obtain the broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) images of the calcaneus. A 13mm-diameter ROI was selected as the position of minimum BUA value locally in the posterior calcaneus. Mean values of BUA and speed of sound (SOS) at the ROI, as well as the osteoporosis index (OI), by their linear combination, were defined. For a more accurate diagnosis of osteoporosis, OI and images of the bone quality distribution of the calcaneus were utilized together. The calcaneus is inhomogeneous and, furthermore, its images are not perpendicular to the direction of the ultrasound beam. Hence, the mean values of BUA and SOS for the entire calcaneus do not have any significant meaning. Accordingly, four image patterns of other OI in the calcaneus were defined in order to increase the correlation between diagnostic parameter and age. The results revealed a higher correlation between the bone quality index and age (r=0.75, p<0.0001), for which the pattern index was reflected on OI, than that (r=0.65, p<0.0001) of OI merely at ROI. This result confirmed the possibility of a new osteoporosis diagnostic method using the BUA distribution images of the entire calcaneus.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 326-328)

Edited by:

Soon-Bok Lee and Yun-Jae Kim




H. J. Kim and S. M. Han, "A New Ultrasound Technique for Osteoporosis: Analysis of Broadband Attenuation Images of the Calcaneus", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 326-328, pp. 843-846, 2006

Online since:

December 2006




[1] S.M. Han and J. Davis: Physics in Medicine and Biology Vol. 42 (1997), pp.1-9.

[2] S.M. Han, J. Medige, J. Davis, K. Fishkin, M. Mihalko, and I. Ziv: Calcif Tissue Int Vol. 60 (1997), pp.21-25.

[3] C.M. Lanton, S.B. Palmer, R.W. Porter: Eng Med Vo. 13 (1984), pp.89-91.

[4] S.M. Han: International KSME Vol. 13 (1999), pp.101-107.

[5] P. Laugier, B. Fournier, G. Berger: Calcif Tissue Int Vol. 58 (1996), pp.326-331.