Comparison among Four Kinds of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold


Article Preview

Bone tissue engineering is a promising way to repair of bone defects. To choose a proper scaffold is still a disputable problem in bone tissue engineering. This study aimed to compare the effects of repairing critical calvarial defects with the compounds of autogenous bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and coral hydroxyapatite(CHA), hydroxyapatite/ tricalcium phosphate (HA/TCP), poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and alginate (AG). The results showed that CHA and AG were satisfactory bone tissues engineering scaffolds among the four kinds of materials. BMSCs/CHA and BMSCs/AG are promising techniques for reconstruction of bone defects.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 330-332)

Main Theme:

Edited by:

Xingdong Zhang, Xudong Li, Hongsong Fan, Xuanyong Liu




L. Liu et al., "Comparison among Four Kinds of Bone Tissue Engineering Scaffold", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 330-332, pp. 963-966, 2007

Online since:

February 2007




[1] L.J. Bonassar and C.A. Vacanit: J. Cell. Biochem. Suppls. Vol. 30-31 (1998), p.297.

[2] J.M. Orban, K.G. Marra and J.O. Hollinger: Tissue Eng. Vol. 8 (2002), p.529.

[3] K. Partridge, X. Yang, N. Clarke, et al: Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. Vol. 292 (2002), p.144.

[4] E. Alsberg, K.W. Anderson, A. Albeiruti, et al: J. Dent. Res. Vol. 80 (2001), p. (2025).

[5] W.L. Murphy, M.C. Peters, D.H. Kohn, et al: Biomaterials Vol. 21 (2000), p.2521.

[6] K.J. Burg, S. Porter and J.F. Kellam: Biomaterials Vol. 21 (2000), p.2347.

[7] W. Dietmar and S. Hutmacher: J. Biomater. Sci. Polymer. Edn. Vol. 12 (2001), p.107.

[8] D. Green, S.M. Walsh and R. Oreffo: Bone Vol. 30 (2002), p.810.