Tensile Mechanical Properties of AM50A Alloy by Hopkinson Bar

Abstract:

Article Preview

An ultralight magnesium alloy AM50A has been investigated for its potential to be used in aerospace and automotive industry. The dynamic stress strain relation of aluminum 6061 T6 and the magnesium alloy AM50A have been obtained by using the Hopkinson bar apparatus. The strain rates range between 600 s-1 and 1300 s-1. The Al 6061 T6 results tally well with those in literature. The magnesium alloy AM50A displays about 50% higher tensile stress at the strain rate of about 1300 s-1 than at static.

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 340-341)

Edited by:

N. Ohno and T. Uehara

Pages:

247-254

Citation:

D. W. Shu et al., "Tensile Mechanical Properties of AM50A Alloy by Hopkinson Bar", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 340-341, pp. 247-254, 2007

Online since:

June 2007

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] B. Hopkinson: A method of measuring the pressure in the deformation of high explosives by the impact of bullets. Philos Trans R Soc A213(1914), p.437.

[2] R.M. Davies: A critical study of Hopkinson pressure bar. Philos Trans R Soc A240(1948), p.375.

[3] H. Kolsky: An investigation of the mechanical properties of materials at very high rates of loading. Proc Phys Soc B62(1949), p.676.

[4] J.L. Chiddister and L.E. Malvern: Compression-Impact tests of Aluminium at Elevated Temperature. Experimental Mechanics. Vol. 3(1963), p.81.

[5] J. Harding, E.D. Wood and J.D. Campbell: Tensile testing of material at impact rates of strain. J Mech Eng Sci Vol. 2(1960): p.88.

[6] J. Duffy, J.D. Campbell and R.H. Hawley: On the use of a torsional split Hopkinson bar to study rate effects in 1100-0 aluminium. J Appl Mech Vol. 38 (1971), p.83.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3408771

[7] S.S. Chiu and V.H. Neubert: Different method for wave analysis of the split Hopkinson pressure bar with a viscoelastic specimen. J Mech Phys Solids Vol. 15(1967), p.177.

[8] N.N. Dioh, P.S. Leevers and J.G. Willams: Thickness effects in split Hopkinson pressure bar tests. Polymer 34(20)( 1993), p.4230.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(93)90181-9

[9] J.C. Gong, L.E. Malvern and D.A. Jenkins: Dispersion investigation in the split Hopkinson pressure bar. J Eng Mater Technol Vol. 112(1990), p.309.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2903329

[10] B. Wang, J. Zheng and D.W. Shu: Dynamic stress and strain rate sensitivity of 37wt%Pb 63wt%Sn Eutectic solders. Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 233-236(2002), p.181.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.233-236.181

[11] B. Wang and D. Shu: Experimental investigation on the viscoelastic properties of porous metals. J. of Materials Processing Technology Vol. 125(2002): p.144.

[12] F.E. Hauser: Techniques for measuring stress-strain relations at high strain rates. Expl Mechanics Vol. 6(1966), p.395.

[13] C.W. Jiang and M.M. Chen: Dynamic Properties of Materials, Part 2- Aluminium Alloys. Report No. AMMRC CTR(1974), p.74, Watertown, MA.

[14] T. Nicholas: Tensile testing of materials at high rates of strain. Expl Mechanics Vol. 21(1981), p.177.