Forming Load Characteristics of Forward and Backward Tube Extrusion Process in Combined Operation


Article Preview

Combined extrusion processes generally have advantages of forming in terms of the minimum deformation power since the material is pressed through two or more orifices simultaneously. This paper is concerned with the analysis of forming load characteristics of a forward-backward can extrusion process using thick-walled pipe as an initial billet. The combined tube extrusion process was analyzed by using a commercial finite element code. A thick-walled pipe was selected as an initial billet and the punch geometry has been chosen on the basis of ICFG recommendation. Several tool and process parameters were employed in this analysis and they are punch nose radius, backward tube thickness, punch face angle, and frictional conditions, respectively. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of process parameters on the force requirements in combined extrusion process. The possible extrusion process to form a forward-backward tube parts in different process sequences were also simulated to investigate the force requirements in sequential operations, i.e. separate operations. It was easily concluded from the simulation results that lower forming load was predicted for the combined extrusion, compared to those for separate sequential operations. It was also revealed that the punch nose radius and the punch face angle have little effect on the force requirements and the forming load increases significantly as the frictional condition along tool-workpiece interface becomes severe. The simulation results in this study suggest that the combined extrusion process has strong advantage in terms of force requirements as long as the simultaneous material flow into multiple orifices could be closely controlled.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 340-341)

Edited by:

N. Ohno and T. Uehara




J. M. Seo et al., "Forming Load Characteristics of Forward and Backward Tube Extrusion Process in Combined Operation", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 340-341, pp. 649-654, 2007

Online since:

June 2007




[1] J. A. Paul, R. Shivpuri and T. Altan: ERC/NSM Report, No. B8928 (1989), p.11.

[2] H.H. Lin, K. Kawakami and H. Kudo: Ann. CIRP Vol. 37 (1988), p.231.

[3] H.H. Lin and H. Kudo: Proceedings of the fourth ICTP (Beijing, China, 1993), p.1239.

[4] K. Osakada, X. Wang and S. Hanami: J. Mater. Process. Technol. Vol. 71 (1997), p.105.

[5] K. Kuzman: Proceedings of the Sixth ICTP (Nuremberg, Germany, 1999), p.805.

[6] H.J. Choi, B.S. Ham, J.H. Ok, J.H. Shim, S.H. Kim and B.B. Hwang: Transactions of Materials Processing Vol. 13, No. 8 (2004), p.689.

[7] SFTC: DEFROM-2D Ver. 8. 0 Users Manual Scientific Forming Technologies Corporation Inc.

[8] Int. Cold Forging Group: General recommendations for design, manufacture and operational aspects of cold extrusion tools for steel components (ICFG Doc. No 6/82, Portcullis Press 1983).

[9] J.A. Schey: Metal Deformation Processes Friction and Lubrication (Marcel Dekker, New York 1970).

[10] Air Force Material Laboratory: Forming equipment, materials and practices (Metal and Ceramics Information Center 1973), p.164.

[11] T. Huziyoshi: Die and Moulding (Daily Technology Press, Tokyo, Japan 1989).