Feature Based Approach for Increasing the Accuracy of the SPIF Process

Abstract:

Article Preview

One of the main issues of the single point incremental forming (SPIF) process is still the achievable accuracy. A number of methods have been suggested to increase this accuracy, but many of these contain a significant drawback. Reprocessing the workpiece can increase the accuracy but also significantly increases the manufacturing time and leads to a worse surface finish of the part. Other methods iteratively correct the toolpath based upon the deviations measured on the previously manufactured parts. This method is not very well suited for one of a kind products, since instead of one part, multiple parts need to be manufactured before the desired accuracy can be reached. Our method proposes to use feature detection to split the workpiece in a configuration of planes, edges, freeform surfaces and other features. For each of these features an optimised toolpath strategy can be determined and the toolpath in that zone can be adjusted for this strategy. The proposed method generates a single pass toolpath that leads to more accurate parts compared to the standard CAM toolpaths. This paper describes the feature based optimised toolpath generation method (FSPIF) and contains the results of experiments performed to validate this method.

Info:

Periodical:

Main Theme:

Edited by:

F. Micari, M. Geiger, J. Duflou, B. Shirvani, R. Clarke, R. Di Lorenzo and L. Fratini

Pages:

527-534

Citation:

J. Verbert et al., "Feature Based Approach for Increasing the Accuracy of the SPIF Process", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 344, pp. 527-534, 2007

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] J. Jeswiet, F. Micari, G. Hirt, A. Bramley, J.R. Duflou and J. Allwood: Asymmetric single point incremental forming of sheet metal. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, v 54, n 2, 2005, pp.623-649.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60021-3

[2] S. Matsubara: Incremental backwards bulging of sheet metal with an hemispherical head tool, J. JSTP 5, 1994, pp.119-123.

[3] J. Allwood, G.F. King and J.R. Duflou: A structured search for applications of the Incremental Sheet Forming process by product segmentation. Proc I Mech E part B Journal Eng Manuf 219(2) 239-244 (2005).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1243/095440505x8145

[4] J.R. Duflou, B. Lauwers, J. Verbert, Y. Tunckol and H. De Baerdemaeker: Achievable Accuracy in Single Point Incremental Forming: Case Studies, Proceedings of the 8th Esaform conference on material forming. Vol. 2. Bucharest. pp.675-678 (2005).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69845-0_15

[5] G. Hirt, J. Ames, M. Bambach and R. Kopp: Forming strategies and Process modelling for CNC Incremental sheet forming, Annals of the CIRP, 53, 1, 2004, pp.203-206.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-8506(07)60679-9

[6] C.C. Kai, G.G.K. Jacob and T. Mei: Interface between CAD and rapid prototyping systems. Part 1: A study of exiting interfaces, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, V13, 1997, pp.566-570.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01176300

[7] P. Lefebvre and B. Lauwers: Multi-axis machining operation evaluation for complex shaped part features, Proc. of 4th CIRP ICME International Seminar on Intelligent computation in Manufacturing Engineering, 30 June-2 July, 2004, Sorrento, Italy, pp.345-350.

[8] T. Varady, R.R. Martin and J. Coxt: Reverse engineering of geometric models - an introduction, Computer Aided Design , v29 n4, 1997, pp.255-268.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.