Improvement of Fatigue Behaviour of High Strength Aluminium Alloys by Fluidized Bed Peening (FBP)

Abstract:

Article Preview

This paper deals with a definition of a relatively novel technique to improve the fatigue behavior of high strength aluminum alloys, namely, Fluidized Bed Peening (FBP). Fatigue samples made from AA 6082 T6 alloy were chosen according to ASTM regulation about rotating bending fatigue test and, subsequently, treated by varying FBP operational parameters and fatigue testing conditions. First, a full factorial experimental plan was performed to assess the trend of number of cycles to rupture of fatigue samples varying among several experimental levels the factors peening time and maximum amplitude of alternating stress applied to fatigue samples during rotating bending fatigue tests. Second, design of experiment (DOE) technique was used to analyze the influence of FBP operational parameters on fatigue life of AA 6082 T6 alloy. Finally, ruptures of FB treated samples and untreated samples were discussed in order to evaluate the influence of operational parameters on the effectiveness of FBP process and to understand the leading process mechanisms. At any rate, the fatigue behavior of processed components was found to be significantly improved, thereby proving the suitability of FBP process as alternative mechanical technique to enhance fatigue life of components made from high strength aluminum alloy.

Info:

Periodical:

Main Theme:

Edited by:

F. Micari, M. Geiger, J. Duflou, B. Shirvani, R. Clarke, R. Di Lorenzo and L. Fratini

Pages:

87-96

Citation:

M. Barletta et al., "Improvement of Fatigue Behaviour of High Strength Aluminium Alloys by Fluidized Bed Peening (FBP)", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 344, pp. 87-96, 2007

Online since:

July 2007

Export:

Price:

$38.00

[1] C. M. Verport, C. Gerdes, Metal Behavior and Surface Engineering, IITT, 1989, p.1.

[2] B. Syren, H. Wohlfart, E. Macherauch, Arch. Eisenhuttenwes, 48, 1977, p.421 G. R. Leverant, B. S. Langer, A. Yuen, S. N. Hopkins, Met. Trans. A, 10A, 1979, p.251.

[3] P. Muller, C.V. Verport, G.H. Gessinger, Proc. 1 st Int. Conf. on Shot Peening, Paris, Sept. 1417, 1981, p.479.

[4] A.A. Mazhar, N. Ahmad, A.Q. Khan, Metal Behavior and Surface Engineering, IITTInternational, 1989, p.193.

[5] R. Brown, J.W. Edington, Wear, 77, 1982, p.347.

[6] J. F. Davidson, R. Clift, D. Harrison, Fluidization, Academic Press, (1985).

[7] M. Barletta, V. Tagliaferri, Int. J. Mach. Tool Manufact., vol. 46, Issue 3-4, 2006, pp.271-283.

[8] M. Barletta, R. Polini, M. Delogu, Thin Solid Films, Volume 515, Issue 1, pp.87-94.

[9] T.S. Eriksson, A. Hjortsberg, G. A. Niklasson, and C. G. Granqvist, Applied Optics 20, 1981 CERAC Incorporated, Technical Publications, (2004).

[10] K-H. Zum Gahr, Tribology International, (1998).

[11] M. Barletta., G. Costanza, R. Polini, Thin Solid Films, Volume 515, Issue 1, 2006, pp.141-151.

[12] H. Wohlfart, ICSP 2, May (1984).

[13] H. E. Franz, A. Olbricht, ICSP 3, October (1987).

[14] M. Barletta, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 173, Issue 2, 2006, pp.157-165.

[15] M. Barletta, V. Tagliaferri, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, vol. 46, Issue 3-4, 2006, pp.271-283.

[16] F. Reidenbach, Finishing Methods, ASM Handbook, Vol. 05, Surface Engineering, ASM International, 10th edition, (1994).

[17] R. Montanari, A. Sili, G. Costanza, Composites Science and Technology, 61, 2001, p. (2047).

[18] G. Costanza, R. Montanari and A. Sili, IJMPT vol. 17 nos ¾, 2002, p.214.

[19] B. Scholtes, Advances in Surface Treatments, 4, 1987, p.59.

Fetching data from Crossref.
This may take some time to load.