The Effect of Interactive Pedometer with New Algorithm on 10,000 Step Goal Attainments


Article Preview

The pedometer, an objective assessment of measuring step counts, has often been used to motivate individuals to increase their ambulatory physical activity. Minimal contact pedometer-based intervention (MCPBI) is gaining in popularity because they are simple and inexpensive. MCPBI is based on self-monitoring by the participants; however, one limitation of using the self-monitoring approach was the participant attrition (i.e., dropout), which makes it difficult to achieve the successful intervention. A new algorithm for pedometer-based intervention, the systematic-monitoring based on conditional feedback, was designed to increase awareness and allow participants to more successfully attain their step goals. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the systematic-monitoring based on conditional feedback algorithm on 10,000 step goal attainments. The study result can be used to design more comprehensive pedometer-based physical activity interventions to increase individuals’ overall health status.



Key Engineering Materials (Volumes 345-346)

Edited by:

S.W. Nam, Y.W. Chang, S.B. Lee and N.J. Kim




J. O. Lee et al., "The Effect of Interactive Pedometer with New Algorithm on 10,000 Step Goal Attainments", Key Engineering Materials, Vols. 345-346, pp. 873-876, 2007

Online since:

August 2007




[1] Center for Disease Control and Prevention: Prevalence of no leisure-time physical activity-35 states and the District of Columbia, 1988-2000 (2004), Vol. 53, No. 4, pp.82-86.

[2] C. DuVall, M. K. Dinger, L. Taylor and D. Bemben: American Journal of Health Behavior (2004), Vol. 28, No. 3, pp.280-286.

[3] C. E. Tudor-Locke: Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (2001), Vol. 72, No. 3, pp.288-292.

[4] C. E. Tudor-Locke: President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports Research Digest (2002), Vol. 3, No. 17, pp.1-8.

[5] C. S. Griffin-Blake and D. M. DeJoy: American Journal of Health Promotion (2006), Vol. 20, No. 3, pp.200-9.

[6] D. R. J. Bassett, and S. J. Strath: Champaign, H.: Human Kinetics (2002), pp.163-178.

[7] B. J. Speck and S. W. Looney: Nursing Research (2001), Vol. 50, pp.374-378.

[8] M. K. Dinger, K. C. Heesch, and K. R. McClary: American Journal of Health Promotion (2005), Vol. 20, No. 1, pp.2-6.

[9] K. C. Heesch, M. K. Dinger, K. R. McClary and K. R. Rice: Women Health (2005), Vol. 41, No. 2, pp.97-116.

[10] K. A. Croteau: Journal of Applied Health (2004), Vol. 33, No. 4, pp.278-281.

[11] M. Kang, S. Kang, J. Park, M. Lee and J. Lee: Patent Application Number (2005), 10-2005-0047745.

[12] J. Park, M. Kang, J. Lee and S. Kang: The Korean Journal of Physical Education (2005), Vol. 44, No. 1, pp.385-398.

[13] D. Gould: Personal growth to peak performance (1996), pp.158-169.

[14] R. S. Weinberg: Exploring sport and exercise psychology (1996), pp.3-24.