Automated Operational Modal Analysis as Structural Health Monitoring Tool: Theoretical and Applicative Aspects


Article Preview

The aim of structural health monitoring for civil structures is not only detection of sudden or progressive damages but also monitoring their performance under operational conditions or under some particular environmental issues such as earthquakes. Seismic protection of buildings at risk can be reached increasing the knowledge of the structural behavior of existing constructions. This circumstance points out the opportunity of monitoring the performance of civil structures over their operational lives. The present paper deals with automated Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) technologies adopted for the School of Engineering Main Building at the University of Naples “Federico II”. In particular, the attention is focused on the development of an automated procedure based on the Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) that must ensure the continuous monitoring and extraction of the modal parameters of the building. Some numerical examples are then discussed in order to point out effectiveness of the algorithm and relevant issues that need to be improved.



Edited by:

L. Garibaldi, C. Surace, K. Holford and W.M. Ostachowicz




C. Rainieri et al., "Automated Operational Modal Analysis as Structural Health Monitoring Tool: Theoretical and Applicative Aspects ", Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 347, pp. 479-484, 2007

Online since:

September 2007




[1] A. Mufti: Guidelines for Structural Health Monitoring, University of Manitoba, ISIS, Canada, (2001).

[2] L. Zhang, R. Brincker and P. Andersen, in: Proc. 1st International Operational Modal Analysis Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, (2005).

[3] C. Rainieri, G. Fabbrocino, G. Manfredi and E. Cosenza, in: Proc. 9th CanSmart Meeting - International Workshop on Smart Materials and Structures, Toronto, Canada, (2006).

[4] S. W. Doebling, C. R. Farrar, M. B. Prime, and D. W. Shevitz: Damage identifcation and health monitoring of structural and mechanical systems from changes in their vibration characteristics: a literature review, Tech. Report LA-13070-MS, Los Alamos Nat. Lab, (1996).


[5] L. Hermans, H. Van der Auweraer, and L. Mevel, in: Proceedings of 17th International Modal Analysis Conference, pages 42-48, Kissimmee, FL, USA, (1999).

[6] A. S. J. Swamidas and Y. Chen, in: Journal of Sound and Vibration, 186(2): 325-343, (1995).

[7] B. Peeters: System identification and damage detection in civil engineering, PhD thesis, dept. of Civil Engineering, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium, december (2000).

[8] P. Verboven, E. Parloo, P. Guillaume and M. Van Overmeire, in: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Structural System Identification, Kassel, Germany, pages 637-646, (2001).

[9] T. Soderstrom, in: Automatica, 11: 537-541, (1975).

[10] J. Lanslots, B. Rodiers and B. Peeters, in: Proc. of the ISAM 2004, , Leuven, Belgium, (2004).

[11] H. Guan, V. M. Karbhari and C. S. Sikorsky, in: Proc. 1st IOMAC, Denmark, (2005).

[12] N. J. Jacobsen, P. Andersen and R. Brincker, in: Proc. of ISMA 2006, Leuven, Belgium, (2006).